Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
High performances of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in cardiac implantable device infections: A study of 40 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tlili Ghoufrane, Amraoui Sana, Mesguich Charles, Rivière Annalisa, Bordachar Pierre, Hindié Elif, Bordenave Laurence
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections are life-threatening complications. The diagnosis can be difficult to establish. Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET.
METHODS: Forty patients who received work-up for suspected CIED infection were retrospectively included (group 1) and compared with 40 controls (group 2); CIED patients were referred for oncologic PET. PET-CT data were blindly assessed. Interpretation was based on visual analysis of both attenuation-corrected and non-corrected images and a semi-quantitative analysis was performed. The gold standard was bacteriological data of explanted devices or clinical follow-up for at least 1 year.
RESULTS: Infection was present in 18 out of 40 patients of group 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET-CT were 83%, 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. Accuracy was 90%. PET-CT revealed the presence of additional pathological hypermetabolic foci in 28% of cases. PET-CT was negative at implanted devices in all patients of group 2.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET-CT is helpful in the work-up of suspected CIED infections. It is a potential tool to make the accurate diagnosis of CIED infection and to assess the extent of infection. The promising results in this indication need to be validated in a prospective multicenter study.
METHODS: Forty patients who received work-up for suspected CIED infection were retrospectively included (group 1) and compared with 40 controls (group 2); CIED patients were referred for oncologic PET. PET-CT data were blindly assessed. Interpretation was based on visual analysis of both attenuation-corrected and non-corrected images and a semi-quantitative analysis was performed. The gold standard was bacteriological data of explanted devices or clinical follow-up for at least 1 year.
RESULTS: Infection was present in 18 out of 40 patients of group 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET-CT were 83%, 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. Accuracy was 90%. PET-CT revealed the presence of additional pathological hypermetabolic foci in 28% of cases. PET-CT was negative at implanted devices in all patients of group 2.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET-CT is helpful in the work-up of suspected CIED infections. It is a potential tool to make the accurate diagnosis of CIED infection and to assess the extent of infection. The promising results in this indication need to be validated in a prospective multicenter study.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDefibrillators, ImplantableEndocarditisFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage EnhancementMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPacemaker, ArtificialPositron-Emission TomographyProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult