Journal of cardiac failure · 2014
The presence of electromechanical mismatch in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mikuz Ursa, Poglajen Gregor, Fister Misa, Starc Vito, Wu Joseph C, Hsia Henry, Haddad François, Vrtovec Bojan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We analyzed electromechanical mismatch (EMM) and its relationship to ventricular repolarization in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
METHODS AND RESULTS: In 39 DCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, electroanatomic mapping was used to quantify areas of EMM. High-resolution electrocardiograph was used to measure heart rate variability (HRV) and QT variability index (QTVI). EMM was present in 22 patients (56%, group 1), whereas 17 patients presented no mismatched segments (44%, group 2). The groups did not differ in age (56 ± 10 years in group 1 vs 57 ± 7 years in group 2; P = .82), sex (male: 82% vs 94%; P = .40), LVEF (27 ± 8% vs 25 ± 6%; P = .18), or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (2,350 pg/mL vs 2,831 pg/mL; P = .32). Although heart rate and HRV were similar in both groups (rate: 80 ± 20 beats/min in group 1 vs 74 ± 19 beats/min in group 2 [P = .47]; standard deviation of normal-to normal RR intervals: 106 ± 79 vs 88 ± 115 [P = .61]), we found significantly higher QTVI values in patients from group 1 (-1.15 ± 0.46 vs -1.62 ± 0.51 in group 2; P = .005). In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmias recorded ≤1 year before enrollment were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (58% vs 13%; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: EMM is present in a majority of patients with DCM and is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In 39 DCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, electroanatomic mapping was used to quantify areas of EMM. High-resolution electrocardiograph was used to measure heart rate variability (HRV) and QT variability index (QTVI). EMM was present in 22 patients (56%, group 1), whereas 17 patients presented no mismatched segments (44%, group 2). The groups did not differ in age (56 ± 10 years in group 1 vs 57 ± 7 years in group 2; P = .82), sex (male: 82% vs 94%; P = .40), LVEF (27 ± 8% vs 25 ± 6%; P = .18), or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (2,350 pg/mL vs 2,831 pg/mL; P = .32). Although heart rate and HRV were similar in both groups (rate: 80 ± 20 beats/min in group 1 vs 74 ± 19 beats/min in group 2 [P = .47]; standard deviation of normal-to normal RR intervals: 106 ± 79 vs 88 ± 115 [P = .61]), we found significantly higher QTVI values in patients from group 1 (-1.15 ± 0.46 vs -1.62 ± 0.51 in group 2; P = .005). In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmias recorded ≤1 year before enrollment were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (58% vs 13%; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: EMM is present in a majority of patients with DCM and is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedBody Surface Potential MappingCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiomyopathy, DilatedCohort StudiesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPrognosisRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricSurvival RateTachycardia, VentricularTreatment Outcome