International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2015
Subepithelial inflammatory load and basement membrane thickening in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a histopathological study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bassiouni Ahmed, Ou Judy, Rajiv Sukanya, Cantero Daniel, Vreugde Sarah, Wormald Peter-John
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients is refractory to optimal surgical therapy and requires multiple revision sinus operations. Studies have shown that mucosal eosinophilia correlates with disease severity. We hypothesized that a high-grade tissue inflammatory load is associated with these refractory patients.
METHODS: A single-surgeon, retrospective case-control study comparing 20 CRSwNP patients requiring a second surgery during follow-up (refractory group) vs a matched cohort of 20 CRSwNP patients without needing further revision surgery (control group). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissue harvested intraoperatively (×2 for the refractory group) were recalled for histopathological examination of subepithelial inflammation and basement membrane (BM) thickness.
RESULTS: The refractory group had a significantly higher average eosinophil count (49 vs 18), relative eosinophilia (55% vs 32%) as well as total inflammatory cell count (86 vs 49) than the control group (p < 0.05). However within the refractory group, the eosinophil-lymphocyte ratio was reduced from their first to their second (revision) surgeries whereas the total averaged inflammatory cell count remained unchanged. No significant difference in BM thickness was found between the groups.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a higher inflammatory and eosinophilic load is associated with refractory disease and thus may be useful in predicting need for future revision surgery in CRSwNP.
METHODS: A single-surgeon, retrospective case-control study comparing 20 CRSwNP patients requiring a second surgery during follow-up (refractory group) vs a matched cohort of 20 CRSwNP patients without needing further revision surgery (control group). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissue harvested intraoperatively (×2 for the refractory group) were recalled for histopathological examination of subepithelial inflammation and basement membrane (BM) thickness.
RESULTS: The refractory group had a significantly higher average eosinophil count (49 vs 18), relative eosinophilia (55% vs 32%) as well as total inflammatory cell count (86 vs 49) than the control group (p < 0.05). However within the refractory group, the eosinophil-lymphocyte ratio was reduced from their first to their second (revision) surgeries whereas the total averaged inflammatory cell count remained unchanged. No significant difference in BM thickness was found between the groups.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a higher inflammatory and eosinophilic load is associated with refractory disease and thus may be useful in predicting need for future revision surgery in CRSwNP.