Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2017
Arthroscopic Joint Preservation in Severe Glenohumeral Arthritis Using Interpositional Human Dermal Allograft.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hartzler Robert U, Melapi Sabelo, de Beer Joe F, Burkhart Stephen S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of arthroscopic glenoid resurfacing (AGR) for severe glenohumeral arthritis at short- to medium-term follow-up.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing AGR (2005-2013) with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up or until revision. Patients lost to follow-up and those included in a prior study were excluded. The indications for AGR were severe primary shoulder osteoarthritis without significant bone loss in younger, higher-demand patients. Outcome measures included revision, pain and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and range of motion. Exact logistic regression was used to assess preoperative risk factors for revision.
RESULTS: Forty-three shoulders with an average of 60 months' clinical follow-up underwent AGR. The rate of revision to prosthetic arthroplasty was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-39%) after a mean of 45 months. The visual analog scale pain score (0-10) improved from a median of 7 to 2 (median difference [Δ], 4 [95% CI, 3-6]; P < .0001), representing pain relief similar to total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients. Improvements in the median ASES score (from 47 to 76; Δ, 28 [95% CI, 17-40]; P < .0001), active forward elevation (from 110° to 140°; Δ, 20° [95% CI, 10°-35°]; P < .0001), and active external rotation (from 0° to 20°; Δ, 10° [95% CI, 5°-20°]; P < .0001) were noted. The mean age of revised shoulders (60 years [95% CI, 54-66 years]) was higher than that of surviving shoulders (53 years [95% CI, 50-57 years], P = .005). The preoperative ASES score of revised shoulders (34 [95% CI, 27-42]) was lower than that of surviving shoulders (47 [95% CI, 43-51], P = .006). No complications were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: AGR with dermal allograft is a safe option for joint preservation in selected patients, provides pain relief, and has an acceptable rate of revision to prosthetic arthroplasty at short-term to midterm follow-up. Increased age and lower preoperative ASES score were risk factors for failure of AGR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing AGR (2005-2013) with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up or until revision. Patients lost to follow-up and those included in a prior study were excluded. The indications for AGR were severe primary shoulder osteoarthritis without significant bone loss in younger, higher-demand patients. Outcome measures included revision, pain and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and range of motion. Exact logistic regression was used to assess preoperative risk factors for revision.
RESULTS: Forty-three shoulders with an average of 60 months' clinical follow-up underwent AGR. The rate of revision to prosthetic arthroplasty was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-39%) after a mean of 45 months. The visual analog scale pain score (0-10) improved from a median of 7 to 2 (median difference [Δ], 4 [95% CI, 3-6]; P < .0001), representing pain relief similar to total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients. Improvements in the median ASES score (from 47 to 76; Δ, 28 [95% CI, 17-40]; P < .0001), active forward elevation (from 110° to 140°; Δ, 20° [95% CI, 10°-35°]; P < .0001), and active external rotation (from 0° to 20°; Δ, 10° [95% CI, 5°-20°]; P < .0001) were noted. The mean age of revised shoulders (60 years [95% CI, 54-66 years]) was higher than that of surviving shoulders (53 years [95% CI, 50-57 years], P = .005). The preoperative ASES score of revised shoulders (34 [95% CI, 27-42]) was lower than that of surviving shoulders (47 [95% CI, 43-51], P = .006). No complications were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: AGR with dermal allograft is a safe option for joint preservation in selected patients, provides pain relief, and has an acceptable rate of revision to prosthetic arthroplasty at short-term to midterm follow-up. Increased age and lower preoperative ASES score were risk factors for failure of AGR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.