Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2015
Shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on strain in the subscapularis muscle.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wright Thomas, Easley Thomas, Bennett Jessica, Struk Aimee, Conrad Bryan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Increasing the thickness of the prosthetic humeral head on subscapularis strain in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty has not been elucidated. The optimal postoperative rehabilitation for total shoulder arthroplasty that does not place excessive strain on the subscapularis is not known. We hypothesize that the use of expanded non-anatomic humeral heads during shoulder replacement will cause increased tension in the repaired subscapularis. We identified a recommended passive range of motion program without invoking an increase in tension in the repaired subscapularis, and determined the impact of the thickness of the humeral head on subscapularis strain.
METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen, forequarter cadaver specimens were obtained. An extended deltopectoral incision was performed and passive range-of-motion exercises with the following motions were evaluated: external rotation, abduction, flexion, and scaption. An optical motion analysis system measured strain in the subscapularis. The same protocol was repeated after performing a subscapularis osteotomy and after placement of an anatomic hemiarthroplasty of three different thicknesses.
FINDINGS: For abduction and forward flexion, we observed a trend of decreasing strain of the subscapularis, as the laxity is removed with increasing humeral head component thickness. With the short humeral head, strain was similar to native joint with passive scaption and flexion but not with external rotation or abduction.
INTERPRETATION: The passive range of motion that minimizes tension on the subscapularis is forward flexion and scaption. Therefore, passive forward flexion or scaption does not need to be limited, but external rotation should have passive limits and abduction should be avoided.
METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen, forequarter cadaver specimens were obtained. An extended deltopectoral incision was performed and passive range-of-motion exercises with the following motions were evaluated: external rotation, abduction, flexion, and scaption. An optical motion analysis system measured strain in the subscapularis. The same protocol was repeated after performing a subscapularis osteotomy and after placement of an anatomic hemiarthroplasty of three different thicknesses.
FINDINGS: For abduction and forward flexion, we observed a trend of decreasing strain of the subscapularis, as the laxity is removed with increasing humeral head component thickness. With the short humeral head, strain was similar to native joint with passive scaption and flexion but not with external rotation or abduction.
INTERPRETATION: The passive range of motion that minimizes tension on the subscapularis is forward flexion and scaption. Therefore, passive forward flexion or scaption does not need to be limited, but external rotation should have passive limits and abduction should be avoided.