The Journal of heart valve disease · 2001
In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pruefer D, Kalden P, Schreiber W, Dahm M, Buerke M, Thelen M, Oelert H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is used in an increasing number of patients, and not only after cardiac valve replacement. However, ferromagnetic biomedical implants are often considered a contraindication for MR imaging because of the potential hazards with respect to their movement, dislodgement, or heating effects during the procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess ferromagnetism, attraction forces, heating effects, and artifacts associated with prosthetic heart valve implants.
METHODS: Seventeen common heart valve prostheses (12 mechanical, five biological) were examined in vitro using a high-field-strength 1.5 Tesla (T) MR system. Attractive forces, temperature changes and the amount of artifacts were assessed by applying turbo-spin and gradient-echo sequences.
RESULTS: The maximal calculated corresponding ferromagnetic force was (0.22 x 10(-3) N) in the static magnetic field. The temperature changes ranged from 0 to 0.5 degrees C maximum. Artifacts produced by the presence of the heart valve prostheses were less evident using a spin-echo sequence than a gradient-echo sequence.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging exerted no significant force on the examined heart valve prostheses, and did not result in significant biological relevant temperature increase. None of the associated artifacts is considered to pose a substantial risk on MR imaging. MR procedures performed with a 1.5 T MR system can be applied safely in patients with heart valve prostheses evaluated in this study.
METHODS: Seventeen common heart valve prostheses (12 mechanical, five biological) were examined in vitro using a high-field-strength 1.5 Tesla (T) MR system. Attractive forces, temperature changes and the amount of artifacts were assessed by applying turbo-spin and gradient-echo sequences.
RESULTS: The maximal calculated corresponding ferromagnetic force was (0.22 x 10(-3) N) in the static magnetic field. The temperature changes ranged from 0 to 0.5 degrees C maximum. Artifacts produced by the presence of the heart valve prostheses were less evident using a spin-echo sequence than a gradient-echo sequence.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging exerted no significant force on the examined heart valve prostheses, and did not result in significant biological relevant temperature increase. None of the associated artifacts is considered to pose a substantial risk on MR imaging. MR procedures performed with a 1.5 T MR system can be applied safely in patients with heart valve prostheses evaluated in this study.