Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
Evaluation of two commercial broth microdilution systems for dalbavancin susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other resistant Gram-positive cocci.
СтатьяОценочное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baccani Ilaria, Antonelli Alberto, Cuffari Sara, Ferretti Caterina, Giani Tommaso, Rossolini Gian Maria
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate two commercial broth microdilution (BMD) systems, E1-185-100 (Merlin) and FDANDPF (ThermoFisher), for dalbavancin susceptibility testing in comparison with reference BMD assay.
METHODS: Study collection was composed of 200 non-replicate multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci of clinical origin, including 180 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 10 vancomycin-resistant enterococci, seven linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and three methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 reference strains were also included as controls. Testing was performed according to the ISO 20776-1 standard, starting from the same bacterial inoculum, and results were compared according to the ISO 20776-2 standard.
RESULTS: Reference BMD showed that 92.6% (187/202) of the strains were susceptible to dalbavancin, whereas few staphylococci and all VanA-producing enterococci showed a resistant phenotype. In comparison with the reference method, Category Agreement and Essential Agreement were 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) and 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) for both Merlin and ThermoFisher panels. A few false susceptibilities were observed, for both commercial systems, with dalbavancin-resistant staphylococci. BIAS values of 11% and 3% were calculated for the Merlin and ThermoFisher systems, respectively.
DISCUSSION: This study, reporting the first evaluation of the two commercially available BMD assays for dalbavancin susceptibility testing, revealed an overall good correlation with reference BMD, although with some underestimation tendency of MIC values by both commercial systems. Further studies involving a higher number of resistant isolates will be necessary to better evaluate this issue.
METHODS: Study collection was composed of 200 non-replicate multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci of clinical origin, including 180 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 10 vancomycin-resistant enterococci, seven linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and three methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 reference strains were also included as controls. Testing was performed according to the ISO 20776-1 standard, starting from the same bacterial inoculum, and results were compared according to the ISO 20776-2 standard.
RESULTS: Reference BMD showed that 92.6% (187/202) of the strains were susceptible to dalbavancin, whereas few staphylococci and all VanA-producing enterococci showed a resistant phenotype. In comparison with the reference method, Category Agreement and Essential Agreement were 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) and 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) for both Merlin and ThermoFisher panels. A few false susceptibilities were observed, for both commercial systems, with dalbavancin-resistant staphylococci. BIAS values of 11% and 3% were calculated for the Merlin and ThermoFisher systems, respectively.
DISCUSSION: This study, reporting the first evaluation of the two commercially available BMD assays for dalbavancin susceptibility testing, revealed an overall good correlation with reference BMD, although with some underestimation tendency of MIC values by both commercial systems. Further studies involving a higher number of resistant isolates will be necessary to better evaluate this issue.