Ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in poor-grade patients with chronic normal pressure hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse the shunt placement in patients who had normal pressure hydrocephalus after poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NPH after poor-grade aSAH were divided into a treatment group and control group, based on whether they had received ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. The treatment group was then divided into an improvement group and non-improvement group according to their recovery. The Glasgow Outcome Scale and Mini Mental Scale Examination were used for 3 month and 1 year follow-up rehabilitation measures.

RESULTS

Of the 46 total patients, significant improvement was observed at the 3 month and 1 year follow-ups (p < 0.01) after shunt implantation in the treatment group compared to the control group. Furthermore, patients who were younger (p = 0.022), had better neurological function (higher Glasgow Coma Score, p < 0.01) and less severe hydrocephalus (lower EI, p < 0.01) appears to be more likely to benefit from the shunt.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had NPH due to poor-grade aSAH would benefit from shunt placement when given the correct candidates and timely management of shunt malfunction. Additionally, the curative effect of the shunt should have been regarded as a long-term goal of rehabilitation in these patients.