Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2007
Patient preferences for facial sunscreens: a split-face, randomized, blinded trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Solky Benjamin A, Phillips P Kim, Christenson Leslie J, Weaver Amy L, Roenigk Randall K, Otley Clark C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sunscreen use is a widely accepted method of primary prevention against skin cancer, sunburn, and photoaging. However, many people do not routinely apply sunscreen because they find application objectionable.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which types of sunscreen subjects are willing to use on more than one occasion.
METHODS: A split-face, randomized, blinded trial of commercially available sunscreens was performed among 139 community members in Rochester, Minnesota.
RESULTS: Subjects were significantly more likely to indicate that they would use alcohol-based spray sunscreen again than two of the seven sunscreens assessed (P < .05). This sunscreen was endorsed as being less greasy, less likely to leave a film, and less likely to leave them feeling hot and sweaty than at least two of the other sunscreens.
LIMITATIONS: Only a representative selection of commonly available sunscreens was tested.
CONCLUSION: An alcohol-based spray formulation of sunscreen was rated more favorable. Recommendations to use alcohol-based spray sunscreens may increase patient compliance.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which types of sunscreen subjects are willing to use on more than one occasion.
METHODS: A split-face, randomized, blinded trial of commercially available sunscreens was performed among 139 community members in Rochester, Minnesota.
RESULTS: Subjects were significantly more likely to indicate that they would use alcohol-based spray sunscreen again than two of the seven sunscreens assessed (P < .05). This sunscreen was endorsed as being less greasy, less likely to leave a film, and less likely to leave them feeling hot and sweaty than at least two of the other sunscreens.
LIMITATIONS: Only a representative selection of commonly available sunscreens was tested.
CONCLUSION: An alcohol-based spray formulation of sunscreen was rated more favorable. Recommendations to use alcohol-based spray sunscreens may increase patient compliance.