Clinical & experimental optometry · 2021
Clinical utility of irx3 in keratoconus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Markoulli Maria, Fedtke Cathleen, Coroneo Minas, Kalloniatis Michael, Whatham Andrew, Yapp Michael, Zangerl Barbara
Аннотация
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus is increasingly being conducted with the aid of imaging equipment such as corneal aberrometry. There is a need to also know the confidence with which ocular aberration measurements can be made.
BACKGROUND: To assess the repeatability of lower- and higher-order aberration measurements in patients with keratoconus using the irx3 wavefront aberrometer (Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) and evaluate correlations with corneal curvature.
METHODS: The irx3 wavefront aberrometer was used to measure bilateral lower- and higher-order ocular aberrations on 33 participants with keratoconus. Three measurements were taken from each eye to determine the repeatability of lower-order aberrations (quantified as sphere and cylinder in dioptres) and higher-order aberration co-efficients (up to eighth order in micrometres), coma, trefoil and total higher-order aberration root mean square (in micrometres). Corneal curvature was measured using the Pentacam HR system (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany).
RESULTS: Repeat measurements for lower-order aberrations resulted in larger co-efficients of repeatability than higher-order aberrations. Similarly, larger co-efficients of repeatability between repeated measures across all Zernike co-efficients were observed in eyes with severe keratoconus (that is, corneal curvature > 52-D) compared to eyes with flatter corneas. The difference between repeated measures tended to be significant for the lower-order aberrations regardless of corneal curvature. The highest correlations with corneal curvature for right and left eyes respectively, were identified for total higher-order aberration root mean square (r = 0.92, p < 0.001 and r = 0.91, p < 0.001), followed closely by coma (r = -0.93, p < 0.001 and r = -0.86, p < 0.001) and the Z (3, -1) co-efficient (r = -0.92, p < 0.001 and r = -0.86, p < 0.001 for right and left eyes, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower-order aberrations tended to be less repeatable, indicating that instrument variability must be considered when monitoring progression. Total higher-order aberration root mean square and third-order aberrations, in particular the vertical coma Z (3, -1) co-efficient, demonstrated a stronger correlation with corneal curvature than the lower-order aberrations.
BACKGROUND: To assess the repeatability of lower- and higher-order aberration measurements in patients with keratoconus using the irx3 wavefront aberrometer (Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) and evaluate correlations with corneal curvature.
METHODS: The irx3 wavefront aberrometer was used to measure bilateral lower- and higher-order ocular aberrations on 33 participants with keratoconus. Three measurements were taken from each eye to determine the repeatability of lower-order aberrations (quantified as sphere and cylinder in dioptres) and higher-order aberration co-efficients (up to eighth order in micrometres), coma, trefoil and total higher-order aberration root mean square (in micrometres). Corneal curvature was measured using the Pentacam HR system (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany).
RESULTS: Repeat measurements for lower-order aberrations resulted in larger co-efficients of repeatability than higher-order aberrations. Similarly, larger co-efficients of repeatability between repeated measures across all Zernike co-efficients were observed in eyes with severe keratoconus (that is, corneal curvature > 52-D) compared to eyes with flatter corneas. The difference between repeated measures tended to be significant for the lower-order aberrations regardless of corneal curvature. The highest correlations with corneal curvature for right and left eyes respectively, were identified for total higher-order aberration root mean square (r = 0.92, p < 0.001 and r = 0.91, p < 0.001), followed closely by coma (r = -0.93, p < 0.001 and r = -0.86, p < 0.001) and the Z (3, -1) co-efficient (r = -0.92, p < 0.001 and r = -0.86, p < 0.001 for right and left eyes, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower-order aberrations tended to be less repeatable, indicating that instrument variability must be considered when monitoring progression. Total higher-order aberration root mean square and third-order aberrations, in particular the vertical coma Z (3, -1) co-efficient, demonstrated a stronger correlation with corneal curvature than the lower-order aberrations.