Infection · 2026
Emerging resistance to imipenem-relebactam among enterobacterales and non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ge Mengyu, Qiang Weidong, Wang Pengcheng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a growing global health threat with limited treatment options. Imipenem-relebactam (IMI/REL) is a promising therapy, but emerging resistance patterns remain poorly defined worldwide.
OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of global IMI/REL resistance among Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB, highlighting species-specific, geographic, and temporal patterns.
METHODS: Studies were searched in Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE (until October 23 2024), and all statistical analyses were conducted using R (ver. 4.2.1).
RESULTS: A total of 149,396 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB were included. Overall, IMI/REL resistance was low at 8.8% (95% CI 7.3-10.5), with Enterobacterales showing the lowest resistance (2.9%) and Pseudomonas the highest (30.7%). Resistance was higher in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and non-fermenting species, and varied by infection source and geography. Temporal analysis indicated a rising trend in resistance over recent years, while data were mostly derived from the Americas, limiting global generalizability.
CONCLUSION: IMI/REL remains largely effective against Enterobacterales, including ESBL and MDR strains, but resistance is increasing in high-risk subgroups and non-fermenting bacteria. These findings underscore the need for local susceptibility testing, cautious empiric therapy, and robust antimicrobial stewardship to preserve the efficacy of IMI/REL.
OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of global IMI/REL resistance among Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB, highlighting species-specific, geographic, and temporal patterns.
METHODS: Studies were searched in Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE (until October 23 2024), and all statistical analyses were conducted using R (ver. 4.2.1).
RESULTS: A total of 149,396 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB were included. Overall, IMI/REL resistance was low at 8.8% (95% CI 7.3-10.5), with Enterobacterales showing the lowest resistance (2.9%) and Pseudomonas the highest (30.7%). Resistance was higher in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and non-fermenting species, and varied by infection source and geography. Temporal analysis indicated a rising trend in resistance over recent years, while data were mostly derived from the Americas, limiting global generalizability.
CONCLUSION: IMI/REL remains largely effective against Enterobacterales, including ESBL and MDR strains, but resistance is increasing in high-risk subgroups and non-fermenting bacteria. These findings underscore the need for local susceptibility testing, cautious empiric therapy, and robust antimicrobial stewardship to preserve the efficacy of IMI/REL.