Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025
Optimizing Dental Implant Success: Biomechanical Insights, Computer-Guided Precision and The Role of Open Guide Systems in Achieving Cost-Effective and Accessible Treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alkhureif Abdulaziz Abdullah, Alsarani Majed M, Khan Aftab Ahmed, Wasi Aisha
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the positional and angular accuracy of digitally planned implant placements with an open-guide system, using a vision measuring machine (VMM).
METHODOLOGY: This in vitro experimental study, conducted at King Saud University (May to September 2024), involved placing 24 endosseous implants into eight replaceable bone blocks. Three implants were placed in each bone block (Nissin™ Dental, Japan), measuring approximately 50 mm (L) × 25 mm (W) × 20 mm (H). A jaw model simulating a partially edentulous mandible was used. Preoperative CBCT scans and virtual surgical planning software guided the fabrication of stereolithographic surgical templates. Post-placement, implant accuracy was assessed using the VMM.
RESULTS: The open-guide system (Group-B) demonstrated significantly improved linear (e.g., L I- II: 1.09 mm, p = 0.001) and angular accuracy (e.g., P III deviation from 90º: 9.59º, p = 0.000) compared to digital planning alone (Group-A). Vertical accuracy, however, was inconsistent, with some deviations reaching significance (e.g., V DI: p = 0.000), while others did not (e.g., V DII: p = 0.552).
CONCLUSION: The stereolithographic open-guide system enhances linear and angular precision in implant placement, particularly in multi-implant cases. However, vertical accuracy remains less predictable, warranting further refinement for improved surgical outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: This in vitro experimental study, conducted at King Saud University (May to September 2024), involved placing 24 endosseous implants into eight replaceable bone blocks. Three implants were placed in each bone block (Nissin™ Dental, Japan), measuring approximately 50 mm (L) × 25 mm (W) × 20 mm (H). A jaw model simulating a partially edentulous mandible was used. Preoperative CBCT scans and virtual surgical planning software guided the fabrication of stereolithographic surgical templates. Post-placement, implant accuracy was assessed using the VMM.
RESULTS: The open-guide system (Group-B) demonstrated significantly improved linear (e.g., L I- II: 1.09 mm, p = 0.001) and angular accuracy (e.g., P III deviation from 90º: 9.59º, p = 0.000) compared to digital planning alone (Group-A). Vertical accuracy, however, was inconsistent, with some deviations reaching significance (e.g., V DI: p = 0.000), while others did not (e.g., V DII: p = 0.552).
CONCLUSION: The stereolithographic open-guide system enhances linear and angular precision in implant placement, particularly in multi-implant cases. However, vertical accuracy remains less predictable, warranting further refinement for improved surgical outcomes.