Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) · 2025
A comparison of peri-implant health across different types of implant-supported prostheses and anatomical locations: a cross-sectional observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoerler Sarah B, Murray Whitnee R, Zhou Miao Xian
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Several patient- and implant-level factors influence the success of dental implants. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of peri-implant soft tissue across several types of implant-supported prostheses and anatomical locations at the implant level.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: This cross-sectional observational study included a purposive sample of adult patients with at least one dental implant and a variety of implant-supported prosthesis types over a 3-month period. Clinical assessments conducted for each implant included bleeding on probing, presence of suppuration, and implant probing depth. The relationship between the implant-supported prosthesis type and anatomical location on the peri-implant clinical outcomes was analyzed.
RESULTS: Evaluated in this study were 134 participants with 456 implants distributed between the mandible (44%) and maxilla (56%) and the posterior (67%) and the anterior (33%). The clinical assessment revealed that implants with probing depths of ≥ 6 mm had a significantly higher risk of suppuration compared to those with probing depths of ≤ 5 mm (P .001). Full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses were associated with higher rates of bleeding on probing and suppuration compared to single tooth implants (P .001). Anterior implants showed more bleeding than posterior implants (P = .02), whereas implants in the maxilla exhibited less bleeding than those in the mandible (P = .003).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of the type of implant-supported prosthesis and anatomical location on peri-implant health, emphasizing the need for monitoring of full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses, implants with probing depths ≥ 6 mm, and implants placed in the anterior or mandible.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: This cross-sectional observational study included a purposive sample of adult patients with at least one dental implant and a variety of implant-supported prosthesis types over a 3-month period. Clinical assessments conducted for each implant included bleeding on probing, presence of suppuration, and implant probing depth. The relationship between the implant-supported prosthesis type and anatomical location on the peri-implant clinical outcomes was analyzed.
RESULTS: Evaluated in this study were 134 participants with 456 implants distributed between the mandible (44%) and maxilla (56%) and the posterior (67%) and the anterior (33%). The clinical assessment revealed that implants with probing depths of ≥ 6 mm had a significantly higher risk of suppuration compared to those with probing depths of ≤ 5 mm (P .001). Full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses were associated with higher rates of bleeding on probing and suppuration compared to single tooth implants (P .001). Anterior implants showed more bleeding than posterior implants (P = .02), whereas implants in the maxilla exhibited less bleeding than those in the mandible (P = .003).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of the type of implant-supported prosthesis and anatomical location on peri-implant health, emphasizing the need for monitoring of full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses, implants with probing depths ≥ 6 mm, and implants placed in the anterior or mandible.