MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0269889710000281

Медицинская библиотека · Science in context · 2011

Dilemmas of a vitalizing vaccine market: lessons from the MMR vaccine/autism debate.

Bragesjö Fredrik, Hallberg Margareta

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A number of issues related to vaccines and vaccinations in society are discussed in this paper. Our purpose is to merge an analysis of some recent changes in the vaccine market with social science research on the relationship between citizens and authorities. The article has two empirical parts. The first shows how the vaccine market, which for many years has had immense financial problems, nowadays seems to becoming economically vitalized, mostly due to the production of new and profitable vaccines. However prosperous the future may appear, certain reactions from the public regarding vaccination initiatives offer insight into inherent problems of vaccine policies in many Western countries. In the second part of the article, these problems are exemplified with the recent controversy over the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine. We conclude that in spite of the improving profit-margins, the vaccine market remains vulnerable and insecure. Vaccines are permeated by society, even more so than pharmaceutics that are used to cure or alleviate illnesses. Radical changes in financial conditions with promises of a more profitable market will not, we argue, solve other even more fundamental problems.

Для цитирования: Bragesjö Fredrik, Hallberg Margareta. Dilemmas of a vitalizing vaccine market: lessons from the MMR vaccine/autism debate.. Science in context. 2011. DOI: 10.1017/s0269889710000281.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.