Cornea · 2020
Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Changes After the Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sedaghat Mohammad-Reza, Momeni-Moghaddam Hamed, Heravian Javad, Belin Michael W, Ambrósio Renato, Gheysari-Alishahi Tayebe, Ghavami Seyyed Hossein
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the changes in corneal backward scattering using Scheimpflug tomography (densitometry) 6 months after intrastromal corneal ring segments (Keraring) implant for keratoconus and to correlate with clinical results.
METHODS: Along with standard ophthalmic examination, Scheimpflug tomography using Pentacam HR was performed to document corneal densitometry and corneal shape. A densitometry map was displayed using grayscale units (GSUs) ranging from 0 to 100 (minimum to maximum light scattering) in 4 concentric annuluses: central 2-, 2- to 6-, 6- to 10-, 10- to 12-, and total 12-mm corneal diameter and at 3 different depths: anterior 120 μm, posterior 60 μm, middle (varying accordingly to the total thickness), and total thickness.
RESULTS: The changes in mean corneal densitometry values for anterior, central, and posterior layers were 3.82 ± 3.13, 2.70 ± 1.78, and 1.68 ± 1.52 GSU, respectively, and for annuluses of 0 to 2, 2 to 6, 6 to 10, and 10 to 12 mm were 2.96 ± 2.60, 4.53 ± 2.28, 2.09 ± 1.74, and 0.45 ± 3.93 GSU, respectively. The mean values increased for all corneal layers (P < 0.05), except in the peripheral 10- to 12-mm annulus (P> 0.05). The highest increase was in the annulus 2 to 6 mm of the anterior layer (5.72 ± 3.70 GSU). Changes in the mean densitometry showed a significant correlation with the mean of average keratometry changes only for the front corneal surface and changes in the Q-values for both corneal surfaces in the 2- to 6-mm annulus for all layers.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant increase in the corneal densitometry mainly in the anterior 2- to 6-mm annulus of the cornea is associated with the position of the ring segment implant. More studies are needed to elucidate the relevance of such findings.
METHODS: Along with standard ophthalmic examination, Scheimpflug tomography using Pentacam HR was performed to document corneal densitometry and corneal shape. A densitometry map was displayed using grayscale units (GSUs) ranging from 0 to 100 (minimum to maximum light scattering) in 4 concentric annuluses: central 2-, 2- to 6-, 6- to 10-, 10- to 12-, and total 12-mm corneal diameter and at 3 different depths: anterior 120 μm, posterior 60 μm, middle (varying accordingly to the total thickness), and total thickness.
RESULTS: The changes in mean corneal densitometry values for anterior, central, and posterior layers were 3.82 ± 3.13, 2.70 ± 1.78, and 1.68 ± 1.52 GSU, respectively, and for annuluses of 0 to 2, 2 to 6, 6 to 10, and 10 to 12 mm were 2.96 ± 2.60, 4.53 ± 2.28, 2.09 ± 1.74, and 0.45 ± 3.93 GSU, respectively. The mean values increased for all corneal layers (P < 0.05), except in the peripheral 10- to 12-mm annulus (P> 0.05). The highest increase was in the annulus 2 to 6 mm of the anterior layer (5.72 ± 3.70 GSU). Changes in the mean densitometry showed a significant correlation with the mean of average keratometry changes only for the front corneal surface and changes in the Q-values for both corneal surfaces in the 2- to 6-mm annulus for all layers.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant increase in the corneal densitometry mainly in the anterior 2- to 6-mm annulus of the cornea is associated with the position of the ring segment implant. More studies are needed to elucidate the relevance of such findings.