Is Laser Assisted Capsulotomy better than standard CCC?

Objectives

To compare the safety and intraoperative difficulties of two capsulorhexis techniques for white intumescent cataract: Femtolaser-assisted capsulorhexis and manual capsulorhexis performed in 2-3 stages, with the Utrata forceps. Materials and methods: A prospective comparative study that included 28 eyes divided into 2 equal groups in which capsulorhexis was performed by using the 2 methods. In the first group, the capsulorhexis was executed by using LenSx Femtolaser. In the second group, an Utrata forceps was used to perform a manual 2-3 steps capsulorhexis as follows: a small 2-3 mm capsulorhexis was performed after the staining of the anterior capsule with Trypan Blue along with a good pressurization with viscoelastic substance. The liquefied cortex was aspirated, followed by the enlargement of the capsulorhexis. In some cases, the enlargement was made after IOL implantation.

Results

In the Femtolaser group, the capsule was completely detached in 13 cases and only in one case, the capsule had a few bridges which detached easily, without endangering the capsulorhexis integrity. Its size was 4,9 mm in all cases. In the group in which capsulorhexis was performed with the Utrata forceps in 2-3 stages, this was complete, circular and relatively well centered in all cases, but the size varied between 4,5 and 5,5 mm.

Conclusions

Femtosecond laser-assisted capsulorhexis was round, well centered and of a desired size of 4,9 mm. The manual capsulorhexis with the Utrata forceps depends on the surgeon's skill and experience and requires a good local anesthesia, the coloring of the anterior capsule with Tripan Blue, using a large quantity of cohesive viscoelastic substances and sometimes using micro incision forceps for helpful maneuvers. The size and centering of the capsulorhexis are not always identical with the intended ones.