Hepato-gastroenterology · 1998
Surgical treatment for advanced carcinoma of the gastric remnant.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Isozaki H, Tanaka N, Fujii K, Nomura E, Tanigawa N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Carcinoma of the gastric remnant has increased in recent years, but a therapeutic strategy for this disease has not been established. This retrospective study was performed to determine the most appropriate surgical procedure for carcinoma of the gastric remnant.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 25 patients who underwent operation for advanced carcinoma of the gastric remnant that had developed after distal gastrectomy (13 for benign gastric diseases, B group; 12 for gastric carcinoma, M group) were studied. Clinicopathological features, as well as the status of lymph node metastasis, were investigated in the B and M groups.
RESULTS: There were more patients with carcinoma invading other organs, stage IV disease, and with N2 or more lymph node metastasis (especially, with a high metastatic rate to lymph nodes along the splenic artery) in the M group than in the B group. Forty percent of patients in the M group were treated by left upper abdominal evisceration (LUAE), but only 8% in the B group. The survival rate (5-year, 46.0%) of the B group was significantly higher than that (5-year, 11.9%) of the M group. When we compared the survival rate of carcinoma of the gastric remnant with that of primary carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach, there was no difference between the two groups in the curative resection cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost the same surgical strategy can be adopted for the B group as for primary gastric carcinoma. On the other hand, for the M group, a radical surgical procedure, LUAE, should be recommended.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 25 patients who underwent operation for advanced carcinoma of the gastric remnant that had developed after distal gastrectomy (13 for benign gastric diseases, B group; 12 for gastric carcinoma, M group) were studied. Clinicopathological features, as well as the status of lymph node metastasis, were investigated in the B and M groups.
RESULTS: There were more patients with carcinoma invading other organs, stage IV disease, and with N2 or more lymph node metastasis (especially, with a high metastatic rate to lymph nodes along the splenic artery) in the M group than in the B group. Forty percent of patients in the M group were treated by left upper abdominal evisceration (LUAE), but only 8% in the B group. The survival rate (5-year, 46.0%) of the B group was significantly higher than that (5-year, 11.9%) of the M group. When we compared the survival rate of carcinoma of the gastric remnant with that of primary carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach, there was no difference between the two groups in the curative resection cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost the same surgical strategy can be adopted for the B group as for primary gastric carcinoma. On the other hand, for the M group, a radical surgical procedure, LUAE, should be recommended.