m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The American journal of emergency medicine · 2005

The inadvertent administration of anticoagulants to ED patients ultimately diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Davis Daniel P, Grossman Karun, Kiggins Danielle C, Vilke Gary M, Chan Theodore C

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES: Aortic dissection (AD) may present similarly to acute coronary syndrome or pulmonary embolus; however, anticoagulation may be detrimental to patients with AD.

METHODS: Clinical data were abstracted from medical records of emergency department (ED) patients with nontraumatic AD. Patients administered with anticoagulants were compared with non-anticoagulated patients with regard to presenting symptoms, chest radiograph and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, and outcome.

RESULTS: A total of 44 ED patients with nontraumatic AD was identified over a 4-year period; anticoagulants were administered to 9 (21%). Anticoagulated patients had a higher incidence of chest pain without back pain (78% vs 23%; P = .002) and ST elevations or depressions on ECG (89% vs 6%; P < .001) and were less likely to have a widened mediastinum on chest radiograph (0% vs 67%; P < .001). Two ED anticoagulated patients died, one required a second surgery for bleeding complications, and another suffered a stroke after reversal of anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a clinically significant incidence of anticoagulation administration to ED patients ultimately diagnosed with AD, especially in the presence of ambiguous ECG and radiographic findings.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты