Journal francais d'ophtalmologie · 2000
[Cytotoxicity evaluation of three tear substitutes used in the treatment of dry eye syndromes].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Debbasch C, Pisella P J, Rat P, Warnet J M, Baudouin C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate cell tolerance of three tear substitutes used in the treatment of dry eye syndromes.
METHODS: Cytotoxicity tests were done on a continuous human conjunctival cell line using microplate cold light cytofluorimetry. Membrane integrity, DNA condensation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (hydrogen peroxyde and superoxide anion) were evaluated after 15 minutes of treatment or 15 minutes and 24 hours of cell recovery. Hyaluronic acid, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose associated with sodium perborate (HPMC) and carbomer 934P were tested at their commercial concentrations (respectively 0.18%, 0.3% and 0.3%) and after a 1/10 dilution.
RESULTS: Cell viability and chromatin condensation were not altered by hyaluronic acid for all concentrations and times tested. A decrease in membrane integrity was observed with 0.3% carbomer 934P after 24 hours of cell recovery and with 0.3% HPMC after 15 minutes. This decrease was amplified after 24 hours and associated with an apoptotic phenomenon. A H(2)O(2) production was observed with HPMC associated with sodium perborate and an O(2) production was found with hyaluronic acid diluted at 1/10.
CONCLUSION: Hyaluronic acid, carbomer and HPMC are in vitro well-tolerated even if HPMC induces a more important decrease of cell viability compared to the other drugs. Hyaluronic acid, with its rheologic properties, with no in vitro toxicity, seems to be efficient for dry eye patients.
METHODS: Cytotoxicity tests were done on a continuous human conjunctival cell line using microplate cold light cytofluorimetry. Membrane integrity, DNA condensation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (hydrogen peroxyde and superoxide anion) were evaluated after 15 minutes of treatment or 15 minutes and 24 hours of cell recovery. Hyaluronic acid, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose associated with sodium perborate (HPMC) and carbomer 934P were tested at their commercial concentrations (respectively 0.18%, 0.3% and 0.3%) and after a 1/10 dilution.
RESULTS: Cell viability and chromatin condensation were not altered by hyaluronic acid for all concentrations and times tested. A decrease in membrane integrity was observed with 0.3% carbomer 934P after 24 hours of cell recovery and with 0.3% HPMC after 15 minutes. This decrease was amplified after 24 hours and associated with an apoptotic phenomenon. A H(2)O(2) production was observed with HPMC associated with sodium perborate and an O(2) production was found with hyaluronic acid diluted at 1/10.
CONCLUSION: Hyaluronic acid, carbomer and HPMC are in vitro well-tolerated even if HPMC induces a more important decrease of cell viability compared to the other drugs. Hyaluronic acid, with its rheologic properties, with no in vitro toxicity, seems to be efficient for dry eye patients.