MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1754-9485.12554

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2016

Utility of hybrid SPECT/CT in primary melanoma lymphoscintigraphy: A retrospective case series.

Tew Khimling, Farlow David

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is widely accepted as an important part of staging cutaneous malignant melanoma. Hybrid single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT/CT) may identify additional SLN and provide important information to the surgeon performing SLN biopsy. We report our experience at a major referral centre for melanoma surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of pre-operative sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy for primary melanoma over a consecutive 12-month period. All patients had planar imaging and hybrid SPECT/CT.

RESULTS

At least 1 SLN was successfully identified in 82 of 86 eligible patients (95.3%). These 82 patients had 144 SLNs (mean 1.8). There were no patients where the SLN was seen only with SPECT/CT. Additional information was provided by SPECT/CT in 32 patients (39.0%). Histology reports were available for 52 patients, 9 (17.3%) had at least 1 SLN positive for metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved a high rate of SLN identification. SPECT/CT was most frequently helpful when the primary melanoma was located in the head, neck and trunk. Routine use of SPECT/CT during lymphoscintigraphy provides important anatomical information and may reduce the false-negative rate.

Для цитирования: Tew Khimling, Farlow David. Utility of hybrid SPECT/CT in primary melanoma lymphoscintigraphy: A retrospective case series.. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12554.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.