Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2023
Validation of the Greek version of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8).
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mylona Ioanna, Aletras Vassilis
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) has been cited as one of the prime reasons for discontinuing contact lens wear. The CLDEQ-8 was created in 2008 to reflect status of and change in overall opinion of soft contact lenses. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of a Greek version of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8), using Rasch statistical analysis.
METHODS: This an observational prospective study of 150 consecutive patients who received soft contact lenses and were followed through with a single follow-up appointment up to a year following their initial one. The patients filled in the Greek versions of the CLDEQ-8, the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and a self-report item on their experience of contact lens use. The CLDEQ-8 was analyzed with Rasch analytic methodology.
RESULTS: The original scoring system of the CLDEQ-8 had to be altered regarding the response categories collapsing in fewer options in items b, 2b, 3b and item 5 of the original scale. The revised scoring system proved more psychometrically valid and the CLDEQ-8 had good measurement precision, category threshold order, targeting and differential item functioning for gender. Two alternative result indexes are proposed, a symptom intensity index and a symptom frequency index to address dimensionality issues that are evident with the items relating to symptom intensity versus the rest. Results from the CLDEQ-8 correlated with the OSDI total score and the self-reported experience of contact lens use.
CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of the CLDEQ-8 is a psychometrically valid and reliable assessment tool for contact lens discomfort in Greek-speaking populations.
METHODS: This an observational prospective study of 150 consecutive patients who received soft contact lenses and were followed through with a single follow-up appointment up to a year following their initial one. The patients filled in the Greek versions of the CLDEQ-8, the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and a self-report item on their experience of contact lens use. The CLDEQ-8 was analyzed with Rasch analytic methodology.
RESULTS: The original scoring system of the CLDEQ-8 had to be altered regarding the response categories collapsing in fewer options in items b, 2b, 3b and item 5 of the original scale. The revised scoring system proved more psychometrically valid and the CLDEQ-8 had good measurement precision, category threshold order, targeting and differential item functioning for gender. Two alternative result indexes are proposed, a symptom intensity index and a symptom frequency index to address dimensionality issues that are evident with the items relating to symptom intensity versus the rest. Results from the CLDEQ-8 correlated with the OSDI total score and the self-reported experience of contact lens use.
CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of the CLDEQ-8 is a psychometrically valid and reliable assessment tool for contact lens discomfort in Greek-speaking populations.