MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000371812

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015

Skin tumour surgery in primary care: do general practitioners need to improve their surgical skills?

van Rijsingen Margit C J, Vossen Robin, van Huystee Barbara E W L, Gorgels Wim J M J, Gerritsen Marie-Jeanne P

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Due to a rapid increase in the incidence of skin cancer, it seems inevitable that general practitioners (GPs) will play a larger role in skin cancer care.

OBJECTIVES

To assess surgical procedures used by GPs in skin tumour management.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 1,898 pathology reports of skin tumours excised by GPs in 2009.

RESULTS

In 22.9% no diagnosis was provided on the application form. Mostly, once-off excisions (no preceding biopsy) were performed, 7% of the excised lesions were malignant, and 35% of incisions were incomplete. Excisions in the face and neck region were incomplete in 65.4%; 22% of melanomas were biopsied or shaved.

CONCLUSION

This study underlines the difficulties in skin tumour management in primary care. To stimulate adequate resource use, the number of excisions of benign lesions could be lowered, and pretreatment biopsy in non-melanoma skin cancer management should be encouraged. GPs should be aware of their limitations and consider referral of high-risk malignancies.

Для цитирования: van Rijsingen Margit C J, Vossen Robin, van Huystee Barbara E W L, Gorgels Wim J M J, Gerritsen Marie-Jeanne P. Skin tumour surgery in primary care: do general practitioners need to improve their surgical skills?. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000371812.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.