Archivos espanoles de urologia · 1998
[Mumps orchitis; review of 8 cases].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
López Pacios J C, Parra Muntaner L, Piñeiro Fernández M C, Gómez Cisneros S C, Sánchez Sánchez E, Rivas Escudero J A, Madrid García F J, García Alonso J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of mumps orchitis in young males in the area of El Bierzo (Ponferrada, Spain) and the complications arising from this condition.
METHODS: The cases of mumps orchitis referred by the primary care services to the emergency services of Hospital del Bierzo referral center were reviewed. We analyzed patient age, unilateral or bilateral testicular involvement, whether the patients had been vaccinated against mumps and the changes observed in the semen analysis.
RESULTS: The diagnosis of mumps orchitis was confirmed in 8 patients, aged 15 to 19 years. Two patients had bilateral testicular involvement. Seven patients had not been vaccinated against parotiditis. Three patients had oligoasthenospermia and are currently being followed at the Urology services.
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of large scale vaccination against mumps is emphasized. Long-term follow-up is recommended for all patients with abnormal semen analysis, particularly those with bilateral testicular involvement, since they may develop oligoasthernospermia several years after the infection or improve with item. A high incidence of mumps orchitis was found for this 12-month study period.
METHODS: The cases of mumps orchitis referred by the primary care services to the emergency services of Hospital del Bierzo referral center were reviewed. We analyzed patient age, unilateral or bilateral testicular involvement, whether the patients had been vaccinated against mumps and the changes observed in the semen analysis.
RESULTS: The diagnosis of mumps orchitis was confirmed in 8 patients, aged 15 to 19 years. Two patients had bilateral testicular involvement. Seven patients had not been vaccinated against parotiditis. Three patients had oligoasthenospermia and are currently being followed at the Urology services.
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of large scale vaccination against mumps is emphasized. Long-term follow-up is recommended for all patients with abnormal semen analysis, particularly those with bilateral testicular involvement, since they may develop oligoasthernospermia several years after the infection or improve with item. A high incidence of mumps orchitis was found for this 12-month study period.