European journal of endocrinology · 2024
Conventional steroids vs. dual-release hydrocortisone on metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone outcomes in adrenal insufficiency: a 10-year study.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guarnotta Valentina, Di Stefano Claudia, Tomasello Laura, Maniscalco Laura, Pizzolanti Giuseppe, Arnaldi Giorgio, Giordano Carla
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is characterized by increased mortality compared to general population, mainly due to cardiovascular disease. Conventional glucocorticoid (GC) replacement therapy has a role in determining the increased mortality risk. Primary outcome of the current study was to evaluate the impact of 10 years of conventional GCs and DR-HC on body weight changes in treatment-naive patients with AI. Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 5 and 10 years in anthropometric and metabolic profile, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular, and bone parameters.
DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 42 patients to conventional GCs (cortisone acetate or hydrocortisone) and 44 to DR-HC (1:1). Anthropometric, metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06260462.
RESULTS: At 10 years of follow-up, patients with conventional GCs had significantly higher values of BMI (P = .031), waist circumference (P = .047), systolic blood pressure (P = .039), total and LDL cholesterol (P = .041 and P = .042), HbA1c (P = .040), HOMA-IR (P = .006), AUC2h of glucose (P < .001), thickness of the interventricular septum in diastole and of the posterior wall (both P < .001) and significantly lower values of oral disposition index (P = .001) and ISI-Matsuda (P < .001), lumbar spine T score (P = .036), and femoral neck Z score (P = .026), compared to patients treated with DR-HC.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-naive AI, 10 years of conventional GC treatment is associated with a worsening of metabolic, insulin-sensitivity, cardiac, and bone outcomes, while DR-HC had no impact on them achieving a lower risk of developing comorbidities.
DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 42 patients to conventional GCs (cortisone acetate or hydrocortisone) and 44 to DR-HC (1:1). Anthropometric, metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06260462.
RESULTS: At 10 years of follow-up, patients with conventional GCs had significantly higher values of BMI (P = .031), waist circumference (P = .047), systolic blood pressure (P = .039), total and LDL cholesterol (P = .041 and P = .042), HbA1c (P = .040), HOMA-IR (P = .006), AUC2h of glucose (P < .001), thickness of the interventricular septum in diastole and of the posterior wall (both P < .001) and significantly lower values of oral disposition index (P = .001) and ISI-Matsuda (P < .001), lumbar spine T score (P = .036), and femoral neck Z score (P = .026), compared to patients treated with DR-HC.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-naive AI, 10 years of conventional GC treatment is associated with a worsening of metabolic, insulin-sensitivity, cardiac, and bone outcomes, while DR-HC had no impact on them achieving a lower risk of developing comorbidities.