Gynecologic oncology · 1997
The utility of pretreatment barium enema in women with endometrial carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pearl M L, Griffen T, Valea F A, Chalas E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of a pretreatment barium enema in women with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: The medical records of 249 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent a pretreatment barium enema were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' charts were abstracted for demographic information, stage, grade, histology, current disease status, and barium enema results.
RESULTS: The pretreatment barium enema was normal in 122 (49%) patients. Diverticulosis was the most common abnormality, reported in 112 (45%) patients. Apparent intraluminal abnormalities were found in 15 (6.0%) patients. Each of these patients underwent colonoscopy prior to treatment for endometrial carcinoma. During colonoscopy, benign colonic polyps were removed from 11 (4.4%) patients. Primary colonic adenocarcinoma was discovered in polypoid lesions removed from 2 (0.8%) patients. Significant luminal narrowing from extrinsic lesions was noted in 2 (0.8%) patients, one at the rectosigmoid and the other at the cecum. No patient was found to have colonic mucosal involvement by endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not justify routine pretreatment barium enema to assess the colonic mucosa for metastatic involvement by endometrial cancer or as a screening tool for colorectal cancer in women with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: The medical records of 249 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent a pretreatment barium enema were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' charts were abstracted for demographic information, stage, grade, histology, current disease status, and barium enema results.
RESULTS: The pretreatment barium enema was normal in 122 (49%) patients. Diverticulosis was the most common abnormality, reported in 112 (45%) patients. Apparent intraluminal abnormalities were found in 15 (6.0%) patients. Each of these patients underwent colonoscopy prior to treatment for endometrial carcinoma. During colonoscopy, benign colonic polyps were removed from 11 (4.4%) patients. Primary colonic adenocarcinoma was discovered in polypoid lesions removed from 2 (0.8%) patients. Significant luminal narrowing from extrinsic lesions was noted in 2 (0.8%) patients, one at the rectosigmoid and the other at the cecum. No patient was found to have colonic mucosal involvement by endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not justify routine pretreatment barium enema to assess the colonic mucosa for metastatic involvement by endometrial cancer or as a screening tool for colorectal cancer in women with endometrial cancer.