MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00366-5

Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2001

A case of orbital solitary fibrous tumor.

Takamura H, Kanno M, Yamashita H, Maeda K

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Solitary fibrous tumor is a spindle cell neoplasm that most commonly arises in the pleura and very rarely involves the orbit.

CASE: A 38-year-old woman presented with slowly progressive proptosis of 3 months duration and optic nerve head edema in her right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed, round mass lesion, which showed isointensity to the gray matter in a T1-weighted image, and variegated intensity in a T2-weighted image and contact with the optic nerve in her right orbit. The tumor was successfully removed by anterior orbitotomy.

OBSERVATIONS: The tumor showed a "patternless pattern" of tumor cell arrangement, alternating hypercellular and hypocellular areas, a hemangiopericytoma-like pattern, and thickened strands of collagen. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CD34 and vimentin, and all were negative for other markers of epithelial, neural, muscular, histiocytic, and vascular endothelial cell elements. The tumor was diagnosed as a solitary fibrous tumor, and the patient was doing well with no evidence of recurrence 15 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This case was the 19th reported case of solitary fibrous tumor in the orbital region. CD34 is a highly sensitive marker for solitary fibrous tumor.

Для цитирования: Takamura H, Kanno M, Yamashita H, Maeda K. A case of orbital solitary fibrous tumor.. Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00366-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.