Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025
Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Guiding Treatment Decisions for Pediatric Refractive Error.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Daohuan, Wu Hongkang, Yuan Lu, Shen Wenyue, Feng Jia, Zhan Jiao, Grzybowski Andrzej, Sun Wen, Jin Kai
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Effective management of pediatric myopia, which includes treatments like corrective lenses and low-dose atropine, requires accurate clinical decisions. However, the complexity of pediatric refractive data, such as variations in visual acuity, axial length, and patient-specific factors, pose challenges to determining optimal treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of three large language models in analyzing these refractive data.
METHODS: A dataset of 100 pediatric refractive records, including parameters like visual acuity and axial length, was analyzed using ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o, and Wenxin Yiyan, respectively. Each model was tasked with determining whether intervention was needed and subsequently recommending a treatment (eyeglasses, orthokeratology lens, or low-dose atropine). The recommendations were compared to professional optometrists' consensus, rated on a 1-5 Global Quality Score (GQS) scale, and evaluated for clinical safety utilizing a three-tier accuracy assessment.
RESULTS: ChatGPT-4o outperformed both ChatGPT-3.5 and Wenxin Yiyan in determining intervention needs, with an accuracy of 90%, significantly higher than Wenxin Yiyan (p < 0.05). It also achieved the highest GQS of 4.4 ± 0.55, surpassing the other models (p < 0.001), with 85% of responses rated as "good" ahead of ChatGPT-3.5 (82%) and Wenxin Yiyan (74%). ChatGPT-4o made only eight errors in recommending interventions, fewer than ChatGPT-3.5 (12) and Wenxin Yiyan (15). Additionally, it performed better with incomplete or abnormal data, maintaining higher quality scores.
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4o showed better accuracy and clinical safety, making it a promising tool for decision support in pediatric ophthalmology, although expert oversight is still necessary.
METHODS: A dataset of 100 pediatric refractive records, including parameters like visual acuity and axial length, was analyzed using ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o, and Wenxin Yiyan, respectively. Each model was tasked with determining whether intervention was needed and subsequently recommending a treatment (eyeglasses, orthokeratology lens, or low-dose atropine). The recommendations were compared to professional optometrists' consensus, rated on a 1-5 Global Quality Score (GQS) scale, and evaluated for clinical safety utilizing a three-tier accuracy assessment.
RESULTS: ChatGPT-4o outperformed both ChatGPT-3.5 and Wenxin Yiyan in determining intervention needs, with an accuracy of 90%, significantly higher than Wenxin Yiyan (p < 0.05). It also achieved the highest GQS of 4.4 ± 0.55, surpassing the other models (p < 0.001), with 85% of responses rated as "good" ahead of ChatGPT-3.5 (82%) and Wenxin Yiyan (74%). ChatGPT-4o made only eight errors in recommending interventions, fewer than ChatGPT-3.5 (12) and Wenxin Yiyan (15). Additionally, it performed better with incomplete or abnormal data, maintaining higher quality scores.
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4o showed better accuracy and clinical safety, making it a promising tool for decision support in pediatric ophthalmology, although expert oversight is still necessary.