Journal of breath research · 2026
A feasibility study using the ETL CoronaCheck® device to identify incident cases of SARS-CoV-2: FIND SARS-CoV-2.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fox Lauren, Glaysher Sharon, Chauhan Milan Aj, Williams Jane, Brown Jonathan C, Zhou Jie, Akbar Sarah, Stores Rebecca, Chauhan Anoop J, Brown Thomas P
Аннотация
The feasibility of using a novel, non-invasive breath-based diagnostic test for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. The study aimed to assess the device's performance, usability and integration into routine point-of-care pathways, while also obtaining preliminary diagnostic accuracy metrics to inform future validation studies. This was a cross-sectional study performed in a single National Health Service hospital. Participants in cohort A were recruited with prior knowledge of their PCR swab results. Cohort B were sequential participants in a prospective 'real-world' evaluation. 385 participants were recruited, with 214 participants achieving a suitable sample for analysis. Of 179 participants in cohort A, 60 (33.5%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 confirmed with a positive PCR swab, 31 (17.3%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2, but a negative PCR swab, 22 (12.3%) were asymptomatic but with a positive PCR swab and 66 (36.9%) had a low clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 and negative PCR swab. Across all participants with a suitable sample for analysis, the Exhalation Technology Limited (ETL) CoronaCheck® had a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 96%. Cohen'sKscore confirmed an excellent agreement between a positive vs negative CoronaCheck outcome against a positive vs negative PCR result (k= 0.990, 99%, SE:0.10). The CoronaCheck demonstrated an excellent predictive value for a positive PCR result, with low variability (both cohorts: ROC = 0.98 (CI:94%-100%)). Most participants (88%) reported the CoronaCheck was easy to use, highlighting its potential utility in clinical practice. This study demonstrates it is feasible to use exhaled breath condensate and the ETL CoronaCheck® device to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a rapid point-of-care test.