World journal of surgery · 2015
Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Ipsilateral Intracranial Stenosis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ballotta Enzo, Toniato Antonio, Da Roit Anna, Baracchini Claudio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of perioperative stroke and the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remain uncertain in the case of an ipsilateral intracranial stenosis. The aim of this observational study was to analyze the early and late outcomes of CEA in patients with a carotid tandem lesion (CTL), defined as a severe stenosis at the bifurcation with any concomitant lesion ≥50 % involving the intracranial portion of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery or the main trunk of the anterior or middle cerebral artery.
METHODS: From 2000 to 2009, 1143 patients underwent CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis according to the NASCET and ACAS recommendations, respectively. CTLs were diagnosed in 219 patients (19.2 %) by extracranial and transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography combined with noninvasive brain imaging studies. The primary endpoints of the study were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and any ipsilateral ischemic adverse events during the follow-up, which ranged from 0.1 to 10 years (mean 4.9 ± 3.3 years). The rates of the primary endpoints were compared between patients with (group I) and without CTL (group II).
RESULTS: Overall, 219 CEAs were performed in group I and 924 in group II. Nearly two in three of the carotid lesions (777 of 1143, 68 %) were symptomatic at presentation (62.1 % in group I vs 69.4 % in group II; p = 0.03), with a 23.8 % rate of stroke (21.9 % in group I vs 24.2 % in group II; p = 0.85). There were 2 (0.9 %) perioperative ipsilateral strokes in group I and 5 (0.5 %) in group II (p = 0.62), and no deaths. The 5-year ipsilateral stroke-free, any stroke-free, and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without CTL.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients with and without CTL who underwent CEA had a similar occurrence of perioperative adverse events (probably due to the extremely low incidence of perioperative complications) and comparable late outcomes, suggesting that the presence of CTL does not justify refusing CEA for patients who could benefit from it.
METHODS: From 2000 to 2009, 1143 patients underwent CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis according to the NASCET and ACAS recommendations, respectively. CTLs were diagnosed in 219 patients (19.2 %) by extracranial and transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography combined with noninvasive brain imaging studies. The primary endpoints of the study were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and any ipsilateral ischemic adverse events during the follow-up, which ranged from 0.1 to 10 years (mean 4.9 ± 3.3 years). The rates of the primary endpoints were compared between patients with (group I) and without CTL (group II).
RESULTS: Overall, 219 CEAs were performed in group I and 924 in group II. Nearly two in three of the carotid lesions (777 of 1143, 68 %) were symptomatic at presentation (62.1 % in group I vs 69.4 % in group II; p = 0.03), with a 23.8 % rate of stroke (21.9 % in group I vs 24.2 % in group II; p = 0.85). There were 2 (0.9 %) perioperative ipsilateral strokes in group I and 5 (0.5 %) in group II (p = 0.62), and no deaths. The 5-year ipsilateral stroke-free, any stroke-free, and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without CTL.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients with and without CTL who underwent CEA had a similar occurrence of perioperative adverse events (probably due to the extremely low incidence of perioperative complications) and comparable late outcomes, suggesting that the presence of CTL does not justify refusing CEA for patients who could benefit from it.