Complementary therapies in clinical practice · 2018
Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Ya-Nan, Zheng Qian-Hua, Liu Zhi-Bin, Zhang Fu-Rong, Chen Yang, Li Ying
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs) on acupuncture treatment for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS: A comprehensive search on multiple databases was performed. Methodological and reporting quality of reviews were assessed by revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR 2) and preferred reporting items for SRs and meta-analyses (PRISMA), respectively.
RESULTS: Ten SRs were included. Among the SRs using AMSTAR 2, two achieved a good overall rating (percentage of items with "yes" > 50%) and severe limitation existed in eleven items (percentage of items with "yes" < 50%). Among the SRs using PRISMA, six reviews achieved a good overall rating (percentage of items with "yes" > 50%), while twelve items were poorly reported (percentage of items with "yes" < 50%).
CONCLUSION: There were many deficiencies in the methodological and reporting quality of SRs assessing acupuncture in women with PCOS.
METHODS: A comprehensive search on multiple databases was performed. Methodological and reporting quality of reviews were assessed by revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR 2) and preferred reporting items for SRs and meta-analyses (PRISMA), respectively.
RESULTS: Ten SRs were included. Among the SRs using AMSTAR 2, two achieved a good overall rating (percentage of items with "yes" > 50%) and severe limitation existed in eleven items (percentage of items with "yes" < 50%). Among the SRs using PRISMA, six reviews achieved a good overall rating (percentage of items with "yes" > 50%), while twelve items were poorly reported (percentage of items with "yes" < 50%).
CONCLUSION: There were many deficiencies in the methodological and reporting quality of SRs assessing acupuncture in women with PCOS.