Association between joint restriction and postural adjustment patterns in different ankle taping methods.

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the effects of two taping methods-Taping A (nonelastic, restrictive) and Taping B (elastic, functional)-and a Nontaping condition on joint motion restriction, postural maintenance, and anticipatory postural adjustments (APA). Furthermore, it assessed subjective perceptions, including discomfort and instability.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthy participants, classified by ankle and foot instability, received taping on their nondominant leg. Measurements encompassed ankle and foot range of motion, leg-heel angle, center of pressure (COP) sway, and soleus/tibialis anterior muscle activity during single-leg standing and rapid arm elevation. Subjective discomfort was rated on an 11-point scale.

RESULTS

In the stable group, both taping methods restricted plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, whereas inversion was most restricted by Taping A. Taping A only reduced eversion. In the leg-heel angle, both tapes in weight-bearing reduced valgus, whereas varus was only affected by Taping B in the instability group. Taping A caused greater discomfort in the stable group, whereas the discomfort levels were similar in the instability group. COP sway or muscle activity during single-leg standing demonstrated no differences. However, in the instability group, Taping A caused delayed soleus activation latency compared with Nontaping and Taping B.

CONCLUSION

The taping methods restricted joint movement without affecting postural control. However, Taping B shortened soleus activation latency, reducing the inhibitory effects on APA, whereas Taping A delayed the activation, potentially inhibiting APA-related muscle function. These findings suggest that the taping method influences soleus muscle function in APA.