Wake-up Call for India on Sleep Health: Systematic Review Findings.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
An Increased burden of noncommunicable diseases and their association with sleep problems exists.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of sleep problems in India.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A meta-analysis of the studies conducted on Indian data was planned using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. To assess the methodological quality, a 10-point Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies was used.
RESULTS
Pooled estimates of 100 eligible studies showed the prevalence was 25.7% for insomnia (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.3%-38.0%, I2 = 99.4%), for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 37.4% (95% CI: 27.8%-48.2%, I2 = 98.3%), and for restless leg syndrome (RLS) was10.6% (95% CI: 7% to 15.9%, I2 = 97.3%). An increased prevalence was seen in patients with diabetes, heart disease, and other conditions. JBI checklist scores ranged from 4 to 9, with a median score of 7. Subgroup analysis showed that both patients and the general population had sleep disorders; prevalence of insomnia 32.3% (95% CI: 18.6%-49.9%, I2 = 99.4%) and 15.1% (95% CI: 8.0%-26.6%, I2 = 99.1%), OSA 48.1% (95% CI: 36.1%-60.3%, I2 = 97.4%) and 14.6% (95% CI: 9.2-22.5%, I2 = 97.4%), and RLS 13.1% (95% CI: 8.7%-19.3%, I2 = 91.9%) and 6.6% (95% CI: 2.4%-16.4%, I2 = 99.1%) in patients and general population, respectively. Excessive daytime sleepiness was a common symptom. Different methodologies and diverse population groups were studied, thus increased heterogeneity was seen.
CONCLUSION
Increased prevalence of sleep problems existed in noncommunicable diseases and the general population. A need to recognize the allostatic load of sleep problems in noncommunicable diseases is highlighted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.