Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2019
The immediate effect of physical activity on ultrasound-derived venous reflux parameters.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tauraginskii Roman A, Simakov Sergei, Borsuk Denis, Mazayshvili Konstantin, Lurie Fedor
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound-derived reflux volume (RV) has a low correlation with the clinical severity of chronic venous disease, as well as other hemodynamic parameters. The difference in methodology of measurements could be a possible explanation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of calf pump activity used in the functional methods on ultrasound-measured venous reflux parameters.
METHODS: Patients with primary incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV) were recruited for the study. The diameter of the GSV, cross-sectional area in square centimeters, time average velocity in centimeters per second, and reflux duration (RT) in seconds were measured by duplex ultrasound examination. The RV flow rate (Q) in milliliters per second and RV in milliliters were calculated. The measurements were performed standing at rest before and 60 seconds after physical exercise (30 lifts to tiptoes at a frequency of 1 time per second). A decrease in the volume of reflux after exercise was calculated (DRV = RV [after] - RV [before]/RV [before] × 100%.) Automatic distal compression-decompression (120 mm Hg) was used as a provocation maneuver.
RESULTS: There were 61 patients included in the study. Before exercise, reflux parameters were: RT = 4.85 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 3.71-6.00 seconds); Q = 3.89 mL/second (IQR, 2.03-5.81 mL/second); and RV = 17.05 mL (IQR, 10.32-25.34 mL). After physical exercise, they changed to RT = 2.86 seconds (IQR, 2.14-3.33 seconds); Q = 3.61 mL/second (IQR, 2.06-6.37 mL/second); RV = 10.07 mL (IQR, 6.08-16.48 m:); and DRV = 40.9%. The changes in RT and RV values were statistically significant. DRV was inversely related to both the GSV diameter and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (r = -0.56, and r = -0.41, respectively; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Venous reflux decreases within 1 minute after the end of the exercises. Reduction of the volume of retrograde flow occurs only owing to the shortening of reflux time, and not the flow rate, suggesting that venous reflux is influenced by exercise-induced changes in the volume of the venous reservoir.
METHODS: Patients with primary incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV) were recruited for the study. The diameter of the GSV, cross-sectional area in square centimeters, time average velocity in centimeters per second, and reflux duration (RT) in seconds were measured by duplex ultrasound examination. The RV flow rate (Q) in milliliters per second and RV in milliliters were calculated. The measurements were performed standing at rest before and 60 seconds after physical exercise (30 lifts to tiptoes at a frequency of 1 time per second). A decrease in the volume of reflux after exercise was calculated (DRV = RV [after] - RV [before]/RV [before] × 100%.) Automatic distal compression-decompression (120 mm Hg) was used as a provocation maneuver.
RESULTS: There were 61 patients included in the study. Before exercise, reflux parameters were: RT = 4.85 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 3.71-6.00 seconds); Q = 3.89 mL/second (IQR, 2.03-5.81 mL/second); and RV = 17.05 mL (IQR, 10.32-25.34 mL). After physical exercise, they changed to RT = 2.86 seconds (IQR, 2.14-3.33 seconds); Q = 3.61 mL/second (IQR, 2.06-6.37 mL/second); RV = 10.07 mL (IQR, 6.08-16.48 m:); and DRV = 40.9%. The changes in RT and RV values were statistically significant. DRV was inversely related to both the GSV diameter and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (r = -0.56, and r = -0.41, respectively; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Venous reflux decreases within 1 minute after the end of the exercises. Reduction of the volume of retrograde flow occurs only owing to the shortening of reflux time, and not the flow rate, suggesting that venous reflux is influenced by exercise-induced changes in the volume of the venous reservoir.