Techniques in coloproctology · 2003
Accuracy of hydrogen peroxide enhanced endoanal ultrasonography in assessment of the internal opening of an anal fistula complex.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moscowitz I, Baig M K, Nogueras J J, Ovalioglu E, Weiss E G, Singh J J, Wexner S D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound in localizing the internal opening of the anal fistula.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with anal fistula who underwent hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound was performed. The results of hydrogen peroxideenhanced ultrasound and intraoperative findings on the basis of operative reports were correlated.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (47 men) of mean age of 45.7 (range, 21-77) years underwent hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound with a diagnosis of anal fistula; 36 patients underwent surgery. The intraoperative internal opening correlated with the hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound report in 22 of 36 patients (61.1%). In 5 patients, the hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound yielded false-positive information with a positive predictive value of 84%. Four of the 7 patients with falsenegative hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound findings had supra- and extrasphincteric fistulas.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a 61.1% correlation between hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound and surgical findings of the internal opening with a positive predictive value of 84%. If no internal opening was seen on hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound, it strongly suggests the possibility of a supralevator or extrasphincteric fistula.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with anal fistula who underwent hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound was performed. The results of hydrogen peroxideenhanced ultrasound and intraoperative findings on the basis of operative reports were correlated.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (47 men) of mean age of 45.7 (range, 21-77) years underwent hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound with a diagnosis of anal fistula; 36 patients underwent surgery. The intraoperative internal opening correlated with the hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound report in 22 of 36 patients (61.1%). In 5 patients, the hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound yielded false-positive information with a positive predictive value of 84%. Four of the 7 patients with falsenegative hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound findings had supra- and extrasphincteric fistulas.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a 61.1% correlation between hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound and surgical findings of the internal opening with a positive predictive value of 84%. If no internal opening was seen on hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound, it strongly suggests the possibility of a supralevator or extrasphincteric fistula.