BMC medical education · 2026
Prevalence of test anxiety among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Omar Yusof Mohamed, Darwish Nour Edin, Elsaadany Mohamed Ashraf, Darwish Yousuf, Eladawy Youssef
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Test anxiety is a situation-specific construct that can markedly impair cognitive functioning and academic performance in high-stakes educational environments. Medical students are frequently exposed to evaluative situations, and test anxiety is common in this population; however, reported prevalence estimates vary widely due to methodological inconsistencies across studies. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of test anxiety among medical students.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science in March 2026, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Studies were eligible if they quantitatively assessed test anxiety among medical students and reported a discrete prevalence estimate. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model with a generalized linear mixed model and logit transformation. Subgroup analyses were conducted by gender, academic year, geographic region, assessment tool, administration timing, and sampling technique. A meta-regression examined the association between publication year and prevalence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for descriptive cross-sectional studies (NOS-xs2).
RESULTS: Thirty-five studies comprising 13,489 medical students were included. The overall pooled prevalence of test anxiety was 49.8% (95% CI: 39.9%-59.6%, I² = 98.2%, Tau² = 1.33), which decreased to 44.9% upon exclusion of studies utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (n = 3). Among subgroup analyses, only the assessment tool showed a significant effect. Nevertheless, prevalence was numerically higher in females (52.6%) than males (46.3%), among first-year students (58.6%) compared with fifth-year students (47.9%); and highest in South-East Asia (59.3%), followed by the Middle East (54.1%). Prevalence was also highest in studies conducted during examinations (55.4%), compared with pre-examination (51.7%) and post-examination (41.5%) periods, and in studies using convenience sampling (52.9%) compared to random sampling (44.7%). Meta-regression showed no significant association between publication year and prevalence (β = 0.003, p > 0.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Test anxiety affects nearly half of all medical students globally. The substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for standardised measurement and precise reporting of administration timing in future research.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science in March 2026, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Studies were eligible if they quantitatively assessed test anxiety among medical students and reported a discrete prevalence estimate. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model with a generalized linear mixed model and logit transformation. Subgroup analyses were conducted by gender, academic year, geographic region, assessment tool, administration timing, and sampling technique. A meta-regression examined the association between publication year and prevalence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for descriptive cross-sectional studies (NOS-xs2).
RESULTS: Thirty-five studies comprising 13,489 medical students were included. The overall pooled prevalence of test anxiety was 49.8% (95% CI: 39.9%-59.6%, I² = 98.2%, Tau² = 1.33), which decreased to 44.9% upon exclusion of studies utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (n = 3). Among subgroup analyses, only the assessment tool showed a significant effect. Nevertheless, prevalence was numerically higher in females (52.6%) than males (46.3%), among first-year students (58.6%) compared with fifth-year students (47.9%); and highest in South-East Asia (59.3%), followed by the Middle East (54.1%). Prevalence was also highest in studies conducted during examinations (55.4%), compared with pre-examination (51.7%) and post-examination (41.5%) periods, and in studies using convenience sampling (52.9%) compared to random sampling (44.7%). Meta-regression showed no significant association between publication year and prevalence (β = 0.003, p > 0.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Test anxiety affects nearly half of all medical students globally. The substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for standardised measurement and precise reporting of administration timing in future research.