General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
Early chest tube removal after thoracoscopic lobectomy with the aid of an additional thin tube: a prospective multi-institutional study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakanishi Ryoichi, Fujino Yoshihisa, Kato Masato, Miura Takashi, Yasuda Manabu, Oda Risa, Yokota Keisuke, Okuda Katsuhiro, Haneda Hiroshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: There is no evidence concerning the appropriate drainage volume for indicating chest tube removal after pulmonary lobectomy. A prospective multi-institutional cohort study was designed to elucidate the safety of early chest tube removal after thoracoscopic lobectomy.
METHODS: Between April 2009 and November 2011, 310 patients with suspected or histologically documented lung cancer were screened. Patients without air leakage or bloody, chylous, or purulent pleural effusion underwent chest tube removal on the day after thoracoscopic lobectomy, independent of the drainage volume. The subjects were classified into three groups as tertiles according to the drainage volume that was observed for approximately 24 h after surgery. The associations between the drainage volume and the development of complications were investigated, with several clinical factors taken into account.
RESULTS: The 162 patients who were enrolled underwent early chest tube removal via this protocol and were classified into three groups according to their drainage volume (0-219 mL, n = 52; 220-349 mL, n = 56; and ≥ 350 mL, n = 54). A 7F backup tube placed within the dead space to prevent troubles was removed by postoperative day 4 in all patients because nothing happened. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the drainage volume was not associated with the risk of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Early removal of the chest tube on the day after thoracoscopic lobectomy appears to be a safe treatment protocol in patients without air leakage or bloody, chylous, or purulent pleural effusion; however, careful surveillance is needed for patients who have a drainage volume of ≥ 350 mL/day.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, 000028971 (Japan).
METHODS: Between April 2009 and November 2011, 310 patients with suspected or histologically documented lung cancer were screened. Patients without air leakage or bloody, chylous, or purulent pleural effusion underwent chest tube removal on the day after thoracoscopic lobectomy, independent of the drainage volume. The subjects were classified into three groups as tertiles according to the drainage volume that was observed for approximately 24 h after surgery. The associations between the drainage volume and the development of complications were investigated, with several clinical factors taken into account.
RESULTS: The 162 patients who were enrolled underwent early chest tube removal via this protocol and were classified into three groups according to their drainage volume (0-219 mL, n = 52; 220-349 mL, n = 56; and ≥ 350 mL, n = 54). A 7F backup tube placed within the dead space to prevent troubles was removed by postoperative day 4 in all patients because nothing happened. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the drainage volume was not associated with the risk of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Early removal of the chest tube on the day after thoracoscopic lobectomy appears to be a safe treatment protocol in patients without air leakage or bloody, chylous, or purulent pleural effusion; however, careful surveillance is needed for patients who have a drainage volume of ≥ 350 mL/day.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, 000028971 (Japan).