DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.021
Frequency, source, and prevention of cotton fibers in the anterior chamber during cataract surgery.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the frequency of fibers in the anterior chamber during and after cataract surgery, their source, and preventive measures.
SETTING
Department of Ophthalmology, Setagaya-Shimoda Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
METHODS
Slitlamp biomicroscopy was used to examine 422 eyes after cataract surgery for frequency of fibers in the anterior chamber. In another 78 eyes having cataract surgery, fibers in the anterior chamber were removed and compared with fibrous materials used during surgery using microscopic and Raman spectrometric analyses. Dust-generation tests were conducted on the fibrous materials used in surgery. In 337 eyes having cataract surgery, highly dust-generating materials were excluded during surgery and the frequency of fibers in the anterior chamber was determined.
RESULTS
After surgery, fibers were detected in the anterior chamber in 7 (1.7%) of 422 eyes. No inflammation was observed during a 1-year follow-up. During surgery, fibers suspended in the anterior chamber were observed in 5 (6.4%) of 78 eyes. Microscopic and Raman spectrometric analyses showed that the fibers were identical to the cotton fibers in cotton balls and gauze. Cotton balls had the highest dust-generation rate of fibrous materials used intraoperatively. Excluding cotton balls significantly reduced the frequency of fibers to 5 (1.5%) of 337 eyes (P = .0239).
CONCLUSIONS
During routine cataract surgery, fibers were introduced into the anterior chamber in 6.4% of cases. Of the fibrous materials used in surgery, cotton balls generated the most fibers. Eliminating cotton balls alone significantly reduced the frequency of fibers in the anterior chamber to 1.5%.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.