World neurosurgery · 2024
Positive Correlation Between Thoracic Aortic Diameter and Intracranial Aneurysm Size-An Observational Cohort Study.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rantasalo Ville, Gunn Jarmo, Pan Emily, Kiviniemi Tuomas, Hirvonen Jussi, Rahi Melissa, Fordell Terhi, Rinne Jaakko K, Laukka Dan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and thoracic aortic diameter.
METHODS: This observational cohort study examined thoracic aortic diameters in patients with IA. Patients were categorized by IA size (<7 mm and ≥7 mm) and IA status (ruptured/unruptured) based on radiologic findings. We investigated the association between thoracic aortic diameter and IA size and status using binary and linear regression as univariate and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 409 patients were included. Mean age was 60 (±11.7) years and 63% were women. Thoracic aortic diameters were greater among patients who had an IA ≥7 mm versus IA <7 mm (P < 0.05). In the univariate analysis, the diameter of the ascending aorta (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.129 per 1 mm; P = 0.002), aortic arch (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15 per 1 mm; P < 0.001), and descending aorta (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16 per 1 mm; P = 0.003) were associated with IAs ≥7 mm. In the multivariable regression model, larger ascending aorta (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17 per 1 mm; P = 0.018), aortic arch (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22 per 1 mm; P = 0.013), and descending aorta (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.33 per 1 mm; P < 0.001) were associated with ruptured IA.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater thoracic aortic diameters are associated with a higher risk of IA being larger than 7 mm and IA rupture. Exploring the concomitant growth tendency in IA and thoracic aorta provides a basis for future considerations regarding screening and risk management.
METHODS: This observational cohort study examined thoracic aortic diameters in patients with IA. Patients were categorized by IA size (<7 mm and ≥7 mm) and IA status (ruptured/unruptured) based on radiologic findings. We investigated the association between thoracic aortic diameter and IA size and status using binary and linear regression as univariate and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 409 patients were included. Mean age was 60 (±11.7) years and 63% were women. Thoracic aortic diameters were greater among patients who had an IA ≥7 mm versus IA <7 mm (P < 0.05). In the univariate analysis, the diameter of the ascending aorta (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.129 per 1 mm; P = 0.002), aortic arch (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15 per 1 mm; P < 0.001), and descending aorta (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16 per 1 mm; P = 0.003) were associated with IAs ≥7 mm. In the multivariable regression model, larger ascending aorta (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17 per 1 mm; P = 0.018), aortic arch (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22 per 1 mm; P = 0.013), and descending aorta (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.33 per 1 mm; P < 0.001) were associated with ruptured IA.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater thoracic aortic diameters are associated with a higher risk of IA being larger than 7 mm and IA rupture. Exploring the concomitant growth tendency in IA and thoracic aorta provides a basis for future considerations regarding screening and risk management.