Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2006
Ocular aberrations after cataract surgery with hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses: comparative study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rohart Charlotte, Lemarinel Béatrice, Thanh Hoang-Xuan, Gatinel Damien
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare tilt and some higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in patients who had cataract surgery and implantation of 2 types of acrylic intraocular lens (IOL), the hydrophobic MA60AC (Alcon) or the hydrophilic XLSTABI (Ioltech).
SETTING: Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Department of Pr Hoang-Xuan, Paris, France.
METHODS: Sixty eyes were included in this study. Eyes in group 1 (n = 30) received the acrylic hydrophobic MA60AC IOL, and eyes in group 2 (n = 30) received the acrylic hydrophilic XLSTABI IOL. Optical aberrations were measured with Nidek OPD-Scan at least 1 month after cataract surgery for a 6.0 mm pupil diameter using a 6th-order Zernike polynomials decomposition.
RESULTS: In group 1, the mean root-mean-square (RMS) coefficient for the total higher aberration was 0.86 microm +/- 0.38 (SD). The mean RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism was 0.81 +/- 0.45 microm, 0.38 +/- 0.30 microm, 0.55 +/- 0.18 microm, 0.13 +/- 0.23 microm, 0.30 +/- 0.13 microm, and 0.17 +/- 0.21 microm, respectively. In group 2, the mean RMS coefficient for the total higher aberration was 0.72 +/- 0.31 microm. The mean RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism was 0.55 +/- 0.30 microm, 0.24 +/- 0.19 microm, 0.50 +/- 0.23 microm, 0.07 +/- 0.22 microm, 0.32 +/- 0.13 microm, and 0.14 +/- 0.14 microm, respectively. There was a statistical difference in aberrations between the 2 groups for the tilt and the coma aberrations (P<.05). There were more aberrations in the MA60AC IOL group.
CONCLUSIONS: The design of the IOL influenced ocular aberrations after cataract surgery. There were more tilt and coma aberrations in the MA60AC IOL group.
SETTING: Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Department of Pr Hoang-Xuan, Paris, France.
METHODS: Sixty eyes were included in this study. Eyes in group 1 (n = 30) received the acrylic hydrophobic MA60AC IOL, and eyes in group 2 (n = 30) received the acrylic hydrophilic XLSTABI IOL. Optical aberrations were measured with Nidek OPD-Scan at least 1 month after cataract surgery for a 6.0 mm pupil diameter using a 6th-order Zernike polynomials decomposition.
RESULTS: In group 1, the mean root-mean-square (RMS) coefficient for the total higher aberration was 0.86 microm +/- 0.38 (SD). The mean RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism was 0.81 +/- 0.45 microm, 0.38 +/- 0.30 microm, 0.55 +/- 0.18 microm, 0.13 +/- 0.23 microm, 0.30 +/- 0.13 microm, and 0.17 +/- 0.21 microm, respectively. In group 2, the mean RMS coefficient for the total higher aberration was 0.72 +/- 0.31 microm. The mean RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism was 0.55 +/- 0.30 microm, 0.24 +/- 0.19 microm, 0.50 +/- 0.23 microm, 0.07 +/- 0.22 microm, 0.32 +/- 0.13 microm, and 0.14 +/- 0.14 microm, respectively. There was a statistical difference in aberrations between the 2 groups for the tilt and the coma aberrations (P<.05). There were more aberrations in the MA60AC IOL group.
CONCLUSIONS: The design of the IOL influenced ocular aberrations after cataract surgery. There were more tilt and coma aberrations in the MA60AC IOL group.