The Journal of international medical research · 2012
An efficacy analysis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening of different screening intervals.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rao D P, Gu J, Meng X H, Zhang Q, Fu M Q, Liu Y, Chen F, Cao S M, Hong M H, Liu Q
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of different screening intervals on screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: A Markov model was constructed, based on the natural history of NPC. The 5-year mortality rate of NPC was the major measurement to evaluate the efficacies of 16 screening strategies. Parameters for the model were derived from published literature.
RESULTS: Screening reduced the 5-year mortality rate for NPC by 20.4 - 43.3%, compared with the equivalent rate without screening. The 5 year mortality rate and the NPC pick-up rate with strategy A1 (annual screening) were 23.6% and 83.9%, respectively. Compared with strategy A1, strategy B1 (annual screening for seropositive subjects; biennial screening for seronegative subjects) had a similar 5-year mortality rate (24.0%) and a slightly smaller NPC pick-up rate (81.7%), but led to a 39.3% reduction in total screenings. Compared with all other strategies excluding strategy A1, strategy B1 achieved the lowest 5-year mortality rate and the largest NPC pick-up rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategy B1 had the highest efficacy for NPC screening.
METHODS: A Markov model was constructed, based on the natural history of NPC. The 5-year mortality rate of NPC was the major measurement to evaluate the efficacies of 16 screening strategies. Parameters for the model were derived from published literature.
RESULTS: Screening reduced the 5-year mortality rate for NPC by 20.4 - 43.3%, compared with the equivalent rate without screening. The 5 year mortality rate and the NPC pick-up rate with strategy A1 (annual screening) were 23.6% and 83.9%, respectively. Compared with strategy A1, strategy B1 (annual screening for seropositive subjects; biennial screening for seronegative subjects) had a similar 5-year mortality rate (24.0%) and a slightly smaller NPC pick-up rate (81.7%), but led to a 39.3% reduction in total screenings. Compared with all other strategies excluding strategy A1, strategy B1 achieved the lowest 5-year mortality rate and the largest NPC pick-up rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategy B1 had the highest efficacy for NPC screening.