The neuroradiology journal · 2020
Unruptured giant intracavernous aneurysms untolerate internal carotid artery occlusion test: Untreated and treated with flow-diversion.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lv Xianli, Yu Jianjun, Liao Ting, Wang Jin, Wang Guihuai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Giant intracavernous aneurysms (GICAs) are located in extradural space; their clinical manifestation and treatment are different from other intradural aneurysms. This study reports clinical outcomes of GICAs untolerate internal carotid artery occlusion tests.
METHODS: Between January 2012 and September 2017, 14 consecutive cases of GICAs untolerated internal carotid artery occlusion test were retrospectively reviewed. A total of nine patients were not treated and five patients were treated using a Pipeline Embolization Device.
RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 12 had compression symptoms and 2 were incidental. In nine untreated patients, during 34 months' (range, 7-64 months) follow-up, four worsened to headaches or ablepsia (more than 34 months). One patient, who presented with ophthalmoplegia and diplopia, showed spontaneous resolution of symptoms at 32-month follow-up. Symptoms in four patients remained unchanged during less than 36-month follow-up period. In five (100%, 95% confidence interval 57% to 100%) treated patients, symptoms recovered completely during 11 months' follow-up after transient worsening of mass compression.
CONCLUSIONS: GICAs frequently result in intractable cranial neuropathy requiring treatment. The Pipeline Embolization Device is an effective option for these complex aneurysms in selective cases.
METHODS: Between January 2012 and September 2017, 14 consecutive cases of GICAs untolerated internal carotid artery occlusion test were retrospectively reviewed. A total of nine patients were not treated and five patients were treated using a Pipeline Embolization Device.
RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 12 had compression symptoms and 2 were incidental. In nine untreated patients, during 34 months' (range, 7-64 months) follow-up, four worsened to headaches or ablepsia (more than 34 months). One patient, who presented with ophthalmoplegia and diplopia, showed spontaneous resolution of symptoms at 32-month follow-up. Symptoms in four patients remained unchanged during less than 36-month follow-up period. In five (100%, 95% confidence interval 57% to 100%) treated patients, symptoms recovered completely during 11 months' follow-up after transient worsening of mass compression.
CONCLUSIONS: GICAs frequently result in intractable cranial neuropathy requiring treatment. The Pipeline Embolization Device is an effective option for these complex aneurysms in selective cases.