Journal of neurology · 2019
Sensitivity and specificity of single-fibre EMG in the diagnosis of ocular myasthenia varies accordingly to clinical presentation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giannoccaro Maria Pia, Di Stasi Vitantonio, Zanesini Corrado, Donadio Vincenzo, Avoni Patrizia, Liguori Rocco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Single-fibre electromyography (SF-EMG) is considered as the most sensitive test for the diagnosis of MG. However, previous studies had limitations, such as a retrospective design, non-consecutive sampling, incorporation bias or were performed in small or mixed populations. Our aims were to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SF-EMG of the orbicularis oculi in OMG and the utility of this test in relation to patients' clinical presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 232 consecutive patients referred to the SF-EMG laboratory for a suspected OMG. Stimulated SF-EMG was performed on the orbicularis oculi muscle.
RESULTS: OMG was diagnosed in 165 cases and other disorders (OD) in 67. SF-EMG showed a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.90). False negative results were associated with mild symptoms and with isolated diplopia. Comparison of the diagnostic yield among patients with different clinical presentations showed a similar diagnostic accuracy of SF-EMG in patients with ptosis and in patients with ptosis and diplopia, significantly higher than in patients with isolated diplopia (P < 0.0001). Twenty-two patients with OMG presenting with isolated ptosis or diplopia, who initially tested negative, were re-tested in relation to a worsening of their symptoms showing a positivisation in 91% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: SF-EMG on the orbicularis oculi muscle is very sensitive in patients with ptosis. In contrast, in patients with isolated diplopia SF-EMG does not exclude OMG. Therefore, the interpretation of the results of the test should take into account the patients' clinical presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 232 consecutive patients referred to the SF-EMG laboratory for a suspected OMG. Stimulated SF-EMG was performed on the orbicularis oculi muscle.
RESULTS: OMG was diagnosed in 165 cases and other disorders (OD) in 67. SF-EMG showed a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.90). False negative results were associated with mild symptoms and with isolated diplopia. Comparison of the diagnostic yield among patients with different clinical presentations showed a similar diagnostic accuracy of SF-EMG in patients with ptosis and in patients with ptosis and diplopia, significantly higher than in patients with isolated diplopia (P < 0.0001). Twenty-two patients with OMG presenting with isolated ptosis or diplopia, who initially tested negative, were re-tested in relation to a worsening of their symptoms showing a positivisation in 91% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: SF-EMG on the orbicularis oculi muscle is very sensitive in patients with ptosis. In contrast, in patients with isolated diplopia SF-EMG does not exclude OMG. Therefore, the interpretation of the results of the test should take into account the patients' clinical presentation.