Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2024
Measurement of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Biomarker for the Differential Diagnosis Between Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Positive Individuals With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis and Nonautoimmune Diseases.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Menezes Pâmella Indira da Silva Oliveira, Veras Flávio Protásio, Cunha Fernando de Queiroz, Silva Lucienir Maria da, Louzada-Júnior Paulo, Oliveira Renê Donizeti Ribeiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have a correlation with disease activity in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, it is not known whether there is an association between NETs and the presence of ANCA in other diseases. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of NETs in individuals with ANCA and whether serum NET quantitation is capable of distinguishing them with regard to the diagnosis.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study. From the positive ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence, 94 individuals were divided into groups: AAV, infectious diseases, and neoplastic diseases. Healthy controls served for comparisons. Neutrophil extracellular traps were evaluated through the investigation of NET remnants, by detecting cell-free DNA bound to proteins such as histone, myeloperoxidase, and neutrophil elastase (NE).
RESULTS: In patients with perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA) the detection of NETs by NE was able to distinguish AAV from infection/neoplasia and healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves for serum NETs by NE in patients with p-ANCA were drawn in 2 situations: AAV versus infection/neoplasia, showing a sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.84, with an area under the curve of 65%; and AAV versus controls, showing a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.88, with an area under the curve of 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: For p-ANCA-positive individuals, we found higher serum NETs detected by NE-DNA in those with chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases than in AAV individuals and healthy controls. This allows us to infer that the evaluation of serum NETs may be of value as a biomarker for differential diagnosis.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study. From the positive ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence, 94 individuals were divided into groups: AAV, infectious diseases, and neoplastic diseases. Healthy controls served for comparisons. Neutrophil extracellular traps were evaluated through the investigation of NET remnants, by detecting cell-free DNA bound to proteins such as histone, myeloperoxidase, and neutrophil elastase (NE).
RESULTS: In patients with perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA) the detection of NETs by NE was able to distinguish AAV from infection/neoplasia and healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves for serum NETs by NE in patients with p-ANCA were drawn in 2 situations: AAV versus infection/neoplasia, showing a sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.84, with an area under the curve of 65%; and AAV versus controls, showing a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.88, with an area under the curve of 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: For p-ANCA-positive individuals, we found higher serum NETs detected by NE-DNA in those with chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases than in AAV individuals and healthy controls. This allows us to infer that the evaluation of serum NETs may be of value as a biomarker for differential diagnosis.