MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000400018

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2011

Headache among medical and psychology students.

Ferri-de-Barros João Eliezer, Alencar Mauricio José de, Berchielli Luis Felipe, Castelhano Junior Luis Carlos

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Headaches occur frequently and thus are a key component of sociocentric medical education.

OBJECTIVE

To study headaches among students of medicine and psychology in a single university.

METHOD: This was a questionnaire-based survey of a cohort of students of medicine and psychology.

RESULTS

The overall lifetime prevalence of headache was 98% and over the last year, 91%. Tensional headache accounted for 59% and migraine 22% in medicine; and 48.5% and 32% respectively in psychology. Forty-five percent reported that headaches had a variable sporadic impact on their productivity. The self-medication rate was 77%. Thirty-six percent reported worsening since admission to the university.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of headaches was very high. Tension-type headaches predominated in males and migraine in females. Tension-type was more frequent among medical students than among psychology students; migraine was more frequent in psychology (more females) than in medicine. Both kinds of students reported that headaches caused low interference with daily activities. The students reported that their symptoms had worsened since admission to the university.

Для цитирования: Ferri-de-Barros João Eliezer, Alencar Mauricio José de, Berchielli Luis Felipe, Castelhano Junior Luis Carlos. Headache among medical and psychology students.. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2011. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000400018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.