Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2014
[Sarcoidosis after adalimumab treatment in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a report of two cases and literature review].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scailteux Lucie-Marie, Guedes Claudie, Polard Elisabeth, Perdriger Aleth
Аннотация
CONTEXT: TNF α antagonists (anti-TNF α) are widely used in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathy (SpA). The efficacy of the anti-TNF α monoclonal antibodies was also observed in unresponsive sarcoidosis to conventional therapy. In contrast, sarcoidosis in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease treated with anti-TNF α keep on growing, with a suspected role of anti-TNF α in this pathological process.
METHODS: We presented here two cases of sarcoidosis developing while the patient was on adalimumab (ADA) therapy for inflammatory rheumatic disease. In one case, the reintroduction of ADA led to increase in symptomatology. We also analyzed the 16 other cases of sarcoidosis developing under ADA treatment published in literature, mostly in RA patients.
RESULTS: These cases show a possible paradoxical effect of ADA in sarcoidosis development in patients treated with anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies. The iatrogenic mechanism remains unclear. These cases underline the importance of a drug-induced etiology survey facing any symptomatology suggesting the development of sarcoidosis in patients treated with anti-TNF α for an inflammatory rheumatic disease.
METHODS: We presented here two cases of sarcoidosis developing while the patient was on adalimumab (ADA) therapy for inflammatory rheumatic disease. In one case, the reintroduction of ADA led to increase in symptomatology. We also analyzed the 16 other cases of sarcoidosis developing under ADA treatment published in literature, mostly in RA patients.
RESULTS: These cases show a possible paradoxical effect of ADA in sarcoidosis development in patients treated with anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies. The iatrogenic mechanism remains unclear. These cases underline the importance of a drug-induced etiology survey facing any symptomatology suggesting the development of sarcoidosis in patients treated with anti-TNF α for an inflammatory rheumatic disease.