MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.21.00163

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021

Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial.

Qin Shukui, Bi Feng, Gu Shanzhi, Bai Yuxian, Chen Zhendong, Wang Zishu, Ying Jieer, Lu Yinying, Meng Zhiqiang, Pan Hongming, Yang Ping, Zhang Helong, Chen Xi, Xu Aibing, Cui Chengxu, Zhu Bo, Wu Jian, Xin Xiaoli, Wang Jufeng, Shan Jinlu, Chen Junhui, Zheng Zhendong, Xu Li, Wen Xiaoyu, You Zhenyu, Ren Zhenggang, Liu Xiufeng, Qiu Meng, Wu Liqing, Chen Feng

Клиническое исследование II фазыКлиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Donafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor and a deuterated sorafenib derivative, has shown efficacy in phase Ia and Ib hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase II-III trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and no prior systemic therapy from 37 sites across China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral donafenib (0.2 g) or sorafenib (0.4 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), tested for noninferiority and superiority. Efficacy was primarily assessed in the full analysis set (FAS), and safety was assessed in all treated patients.

RESULTS

Between March 21, 2016, and April 16, 2018, 668 patients (intention-to-treat) were randomly assigned to donafenib and sorafenib treatment arms; the FAS included 328 and 331 patients, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer with donafenib than sorafenib treatment (FAS; 12.1 v 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.699 to 0.988; P = .0245); donafenib also exhibited superior OS outcomes versus sorafenib in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 3.7 v 3.6 months (P = .0570). The objective response rate was 4.6% v 2.7% (P = .2448), and the disease control rate was 30.8% v 28.7% (FAS; P = .5532). Drug-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving donafenib than sorafenib (125 [38%] v 165 [50%]; P = .0018).

CONCLUSION

Donafenib showed superiority over sorafenib in improving OS and has favorable safety and tolerability in Chinese patients with advanced HCC, showing promise as a potential first-line monotherapy for these patients.

Для цитирования: Qin Shukui, Bi Feng, Gu Shanzhi, Bai Yuxian, Chen Zhendong, Wang Zishu, Ying Jieer, Lu Yinying, Meng Zhiqiang, Pan Hongming, Yang Ping, Zhang Helong, Chen Xi, Xu Aibing, Cui Chengxu, Zhu Bo, Wu Jian, Xin Xiaoli, Wang Jufeng, Shan Jinlu, Chen Junhui, Zheng Zhendong, Xu Li, Wen Xiaoyu, You Zhenyu, Ren Zhenggang, Liu Xiufeng, Qiu Meng, Wu Liqing, Chen Feng. Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2021. DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.