Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025
Conversion of disclosed lens power formula constants.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Langenbucher Achim, Hoffmann Peter, Cayless Alan, Wendelstein Jascha, Szentmáry Nóra
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present a concept for interconverting constants of disclosed lens power formulas and to simplify these conversions to linear prediction models for clinical use.
SETTING: Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-center case series.
METHODS: Analysis based on a dataset with biometric measurements of 19 472 eyes in a cataractous population performed with the IOLMaster 700. The formula constant conversion from formula A to B includes 2 steps: calculation of the lens power using formula A with variation of formula A constant and back calculation of the constant for formula B for all constant values of formula A using nonlinear iterative optimization techniques to minimize the sum of squared formula B prediction error.
RESULTS: Formula conversion was calculated for the SRK/T A-constant (A = 117 to 121), Hoffer Q (pACD = 4.2 to 6.8), Holladay 1 (SF 0.5 to 3.0), Haigis (a0 0.0 to 2.5 with a1/a2 = 0.4/0.1), and Castrop (C 0.15 to 0.50 with H/R = 0.0) formulas. As the conversions follow linear dependencies, linear regression models were fitted to simplify formula constant conversions in clinical routine.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversions of formula constants could be used in cases where, for example, new lens models are launched with only the nominal SRK/T A-constant available or in situations where constants for some of the formulas are not available. Conversions to constant triplets for the Haigis or Castrop formula require additional nonlinear boundary conditions to take full advantage of formulas with multiple constants.
SETTING: Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-center case series.
METHODS: Analysis based on a dataset with biometric measurements of 19 472 eyes in a cataractous population performed with the IOLMaster 700. The formula constant conversion from formula A to B includes 2 steps: calculation of the lens power using formula A with variation of formula A constant and back calculation of the constant for formula B for all constant values of formula A using nonlinear iterative optimization techniques to minimize the sum of squared formula B prediction error.
RESULTS: Formula conversion was calculated for the SRK/T A-constant (A = 117 to 121), Hoffer Q (pACD = 4.2 to 6.8), Holladay 1 (SF 0.5 to 3.0), Haigis (a0 0.0 to 2.5 with a1/a2 = 0.4/0.1), and Castrop (C 0.15 to 0.50 with H/R = 0.0) formulas. As the conversions follow linear dependencies, linear regression models were fitted to simplify formula constant conversions in clinical routine.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversions of formula constants could be used in cases where, for example, new lens models are launched with only the nominal SRK/T A-constant available or in situations where constants for some of the formulas are not available. Conversions to constant triplets for the Haigis or Castrop formula require additional nonlinear boundary conditions to take full advantage of formulas with multiple constants.