MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6166

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA oncology · 2021

Efficacy of Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan vs Irinotecan Monotherapy as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial (GB-SELECT).

Ramaswamy Anant, Ostwal Vikas, Sharma Atul, Bhargava Prabhat, Srinivas Sujay, Goel Mahesh, Patkar Shraddha, Mandavkar Sarika, Jadhav Poonam, Parulekar Manali, Choudhari Amitkumar, Gupta Sudeep

Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

There is therapeutic uncertainty regarding use of combination or single-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with gallbladder cancer who experience disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) vs irinotecan (IRI) alone in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) who have disease progression after gemcitabine-based first-line treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

The GB-SELECT trial was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial of CAPIRI vs IRI alone for treatment of gallbladder cancer in patients who had disease progression after prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.The study was carried out in 2 tertiary care institutions in India. Patients aged between 18 and 70 years with histopathologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma gallbladder, advanced or metastatic disease, previous treatment with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, adequate hematologic, liver, and renal functions, and ECOG performance status of 1 or less were included in the study between August 2018 and January 2020. The data were analyzed for this report with cutoff on May 19, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine, 1700 mg/m2 per day, on days 1 to 14 plus intravenous irinotecan, 200 mg/m2, on day 1 or intravenous irinotecan, 240 mg/m2, on day 1, in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) at 6 months. The secondary end points were progression-free survival and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were randomized, 49 in each arm, with median (range) age of 51 (29-70) years, with 60 (61%) being women. In the CAPIRI vs IRI arms, the number of deaths at 6 months, 6-month OS, and median OS were 35, 34, 38.4% (95% CI, 24.2%-52.6%) and 5.16 (95% CI, 4.26-6.06) months vs 34, 29, 54.2% (95% CI, 39.4%-69.0%) and 6.28 (95% CI, 4.25-8.30) months, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.64-1.49, P = .93). There were no chemotherapy-related deaths but more patients required dose modification in CAPIRI compared with the IRI arm (13 [27%] vs 4 [9%], respectively, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There was no significant difference in OS between treatment with capecitabine plus irinotecan or irinotecan alone among previously treated patients with gallbladder cancer. Single-agent irinotecan should be the preferred treatment option for such patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/10/010112.

Для цитирования: Ramaswamy Anant, Ostwal Vikas, Sharma Atul, Bhargava Prabhat, Srinivas Sujay, Goel Mahesh, Patkar Shraddha, Mandavkar Sarika, Jadhav Poonam, Parulekar Manali, Choudhari Amitkumar, Gupta Sudeep. Efficacy of Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan vs Irinotecan Monotherapy as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial (GB-SELECT).. JAMA oncology. 2021. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6166.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.