Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
Accommodative Demand and Near Addition in Early-Onset Primary Angle-Closure Disease: A Comparative Study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yadav Suresh Kumar, Panigrahi Arnav, Pathak Anand Kumar, Singh Nishtha, Singh Sonika, Das Sumit Kumar, Gupta Viney
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Early-onset primary angle-closure disease (EOPACD), defined by onset before 40 years of age, is associated with a thicker and more anteriorly positioned crystalline lens and a crowded anterior segment, which may alter accommodative performance. This study aimed to compare accommodative function and near-addition requirements in EOPACD with those in age-matched healthy controls, and to assess the relationship between anterior segment biometry and accommodative outcomes.
METHODS: This prospective case-control study compared unrelated EOPACD patients with healthy controls. Multiple clinical parameters pertaining to the refractive apparatus of the eye, including refraction, amplitude of accommodation (AA), negative relative accommodation (NRA), positive relative accommodation (PRA) and near-addition, were assessed using standardised clinical methods. Group differences were analysed using linear regression with cluster-robust standard errors, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex and refractive error, with marginal means and effect sizes reported.
RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes, including 85 EOPACD and 79 controls, from 90 unrelated participants were analysed. The groups were comparable in age (p = 0.37). Eyes with EOPACD demonstrated a higher AA than controls in both unadjusted analyses (6.59 D [95% CI: 5.89-7.28] vs. 5.51 D [5.06-5.96]; p = 0.01) and adjusted analyses (6.50 D [5.93-7.10] vs. 5.60 D [5.12-6.10]; p = 0.02, Cohen's d = 0.50). The near-addition requirement was significantly lower in EOPACD eyes in both unadjusted (0.61 D [0.44-0.78] vs. 0.91 D [0.76-1.05]; p = 0.01) and adjusted models (0.63 D [0.49-0.76] vs. 0.89 D [0.76-1.03]; p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.61). NRA, PRA and best-corrected distance visual acuity did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with EOPACD demonstrated preserved or enhanced AA and reduced near-addition demand compared with age-matched healthy eyes. These findings are more supportive of a relative optical advantage related to the anterior segment configuration.
METHODS: This prospective case-control study compared unrelated EOPACD patients with healthy controls. Multiple clinical parameters pertaining to the refractive apparatus of the eye, including refraction, amplitude of accommodation (AA), negative relative accommodation (NRA), positive relative accommodation (PRA) and near-addition, were assessed using standardised clinical methods. Group differences were analysed using linear regression with cluster-robust standard errors, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex and refractive error, with marginal means and effect sizes reported.
RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes, including 85 EOPACD and 79 controls, from 90 unrelated participants were analysed. The groups were comparable in age (p = 0.37). Eyes with EOPACD demonstrated a higher AA than controls in both unadjusted analyses (6.59 D [95% CI: 5.89-7.28] vs. 5.51 D [5.06-5.96]; p = 0.01) and adjusted analyses (6.50 D [5.93-7.10] vs. 5.60 D [5.12-6.10]; p = 0.02, Cohen's d = 0.50). The near-addition requirement was significantly lower in EOPACD eyes in both unadjusted (0.61 D [0.44-0.78] vs. 0.91 D [0.76-1.05]; p = 0.01) and adjusted models (0.63 D [0.49-0.76] vs. 0.89 D [0.76-1.03]; p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.61). NRA, PRA and best-corrected distance visual acuity did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with EOPACD demonstrated preserved or enhanced AA and reduced near-addition demand compared with age-matched healthy eyes. These findings are more supportive of a relative optical advantage related to the anterior segment configuration.