MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/377699

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 2004

Incremental effectiveness of 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine compared with 1 dose among high school students during an outbreak.

Lynn Tracey V, Beller Michael, Funk Elizabeth A, Middaugh John P, Ritter Donald, Rota Paul A, Bellini William J, Torok Thomas J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A measles outbreak occurred among a highly vaccinated population in Alaska during 1998, providing an opportunity to determine the incremental efficacy of >or=2 doses of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) compared with 1 dose. Of 33 confirmed case patients identified, 31 had been vaccinated with 1 dose of MCV, 1 had received 2 doses, and vaccination status was unknown in 1 case. Seventy percent of cases were school-associated; 58% of cases occurred in 2 high schools. Of 3679 students attending the 2 schools, 50.4% and 45.5% had received >or=2 doses of MCV before measles introduction at the schools. The relative risk of developing measles among persons vaccinated with >or=2 doses of MCV compared with 1 dose was 0.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.44; P<.001), yielding an estimated incremental vaccine efficacy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.9%-99.2%; P<.001). Rapid implementation of a mandatory second-dose MCV requirement probably limited the extent of this outbreak.

Для цитирования: Lynn Tracey V, Beller Michael, Funk Elizabeth A, Middaugh John P, Ritter Donald, Rota Paul A, Bellini William J, Torok Thomas J. Incremental effectiveness of 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine compared with 1 dose among high school students during an outbreak.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2004. DOI: 10.1086/377699.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.